Accident law leaves a lot to be desired

2020-12-17 中國日報網英語點津

If a man riding a tricycle bumps into your car parked legally on the roadside and dies of the injury sustained, and police tell you that you should pay part compensation to the man's family, what would you think?

Don't be quick to scream "unfair!" Read Article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law and you will know you are legally liable to pay the compensation.

According to the law, "when an accident occurs involving a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle or a pedestrian and there is evidence proving that the non-motor vehicle or the pedestrian is fully responsible for the accident, the motor vehicle party shall bear a no more than 10 percent responsibility for the compensation".

But even that amount of penalty can be painful for a motorist questioning the fairness of the law.

The Beijing Evening News reported on Monday that a woman who had parked her car in a legal roadside parking lot was ordered to pay compensation for the death of a man who bumped his tricycle into the car. He died of his injuries in a hospital later. The woman posted her doubts over the law on an Internet forum to seek help from netizens. "I was not in the car and I didn't do anything wrong. Why should I pay for somebody else's fault?" she said.

I would have asked the same question if I were the owner of the car. But a judge interviewed by the Beijing Evening News reporter said the woman should pay the compensation, "because the Road Traffic Safety Law does not exempt the motor vehicle party from liability in (the event of) an accident involving a motor vehicle and a pedestrian unless the pedestrian causes the accident deliberately".

Ever since its enactment in May 2004, the Road Traffic Safety Law has been mired in controversy. Before being revised in December 2007, the original version of the 76th article of the law appeared even more "unreasonable". It ruled: "If an accident occurs between a motor vehicle and a non-motorized vehicle or a pedestrian, the motor vehicle party shall bear the responsibility; but the party's responsibility shall decrease if there is evidence to prove that the non-motorized vehicle or pedestrian has violated the Road Traffic Safety Law and the driver of the motor vehicle has taken necessary measures during the accident."

Many people questioned the rationality of the law. They argued that the 76th article of the law amounted to a statement that a car owner is destined to be the offender from the moment he/she buys the car.

The aforementioned judge explained that the law was based on the General Rules of Civil Law, which states that a motor vehicle is a high-speed moving object and its operation is highly hazardous, and therefore its driver should bear a non-fault liability when the vehicle causes damage to other people.

Here comes a question. In the woman's case, her car was parked on the roadside. It was not a "high-speed moving object" and therefore not "hazardous" at all. Isn't it ridiculous to blame the car owner when the accident was caused by the tricycle rider? The problem lies with the 76th article of the law, both in its original version and revision, which does not specify the difference between a moving vehicle and one that is parked when an accident involving it occurs.

It was believed that the new Road Traffic Safety Law was the result of China's progress toward "human-oriented governance by law" introduced by "legal experts" from Western countries. Of course, we should salute these experts for their contribution to our country's progress.

But I also hope they are more meticulous in drafting laws, and do not leave loopholes. They should be more careful while learning from Western statutes. For example, they could learn from their American colleagues who would explain the Colorado state law on traffic accidents: "A traffic accident is defined as unintentional damage or injury caused by the movement of a vehicle or its load."

Note the word "movement".

E-mail: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

About the author:

劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業於武漢華中師範學院(現華中師範大學)英文系。1982年畢業於北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先後擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院「特殊貢獻專家政府津貼」。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予「全國百佳新聞工作者」稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

 相關閱讀:

Blocking Net info all about saving youth

Hard to help the elderly now

Kids should study less, play more

Where do officials do their jobs?

 

 

相關焦點

  • accident「意外;事故」的運用及起源
    Word of the Day : November 6, 2020accident意外;(交通)事故;意外遭遇noun AK-suh-dunt不幸的事,尤其是由粗心或無知造成的b medical : an unexpected and medically important bodily event especially when injurious醫療上:意外和醫學上重要的身體問題,尤其是在受傷時c law
  • 《55 Successful Harvard Law School Essays》精讀系列 4:從方言研究到why law
    The essay’s structure, in which she first presents her interest in language and concludes by illustrating how law and language intersect, is a formula overused in law-school admissions essays.
  • accident是「事故」,那麼by accident呢
    拿單詞accident為例,我們經常用的是它的「事故」這個意思,其實它還有其它的意思。比如「偶然」,百度翻譯裡面是這麼說的:accident英[ˈæksɪdənt]美[ˈæksɪdənt]>沒有預見的或非計劃內的事情,可以理解為「偶然發生」典型錯誤是這樣的:Her car bumped into mine by an accident.
  • #SuzyPFW Chanel: When the Leaves Start to Fall
    敬請期待中文版Chanel's Autumn/Winter 2018 show transformed the Grand Palais in Paris into a poetic forest of bare trees and fallen leavesInDigital.TV
  • 雅思口語:a good law in your country
    除非你上過law school,我們普通人張口就來的法律貌似都是從新聞聯播裡聽來的,比如《未成年人保護法》,或者《道路交通安全法》等等。如果你不是法律專業的學生,用英文來談這麼學術的內容,難度可不小啊。
  • 讀新聞·學英語丨At least 77 injured in traffic accident in Hong Kong
    Around 8:30 am local time on Tuesday, the Fire Services Department of the HKSAR government was informed about this accident, when the two buses collided outside the tunnel, which is a major road
  • 「get a lot of stick」別理解成「拿了很多棍子」
    大家好,歡迎來的餅哥英語的頻道,今天我們分享一個非常有用且地道的表達——get a lot of stick, 這個短語的含義不是指「拿了很多棍子」,其正確的含義是:get a lot of stick 受到強烈批評,遭到強烈反對
  • 「accident」是什麼意思?
    accident,(交通)事故;意外遭遇;不測事件;意外;偶然的事。There was a little accident.發生了一點小意外。We are investigating the cause of the accident.我們正在調查意外事件的原因。I suffered a serious injury in anaccident.
  • 中考英語閱讀理解考前強化:The law
    The law says that women should have the chance of doing the same jobs as men and earn the same as them.   The reality is very different.
  • Accident & Incident
    用incident永遠不會錯,但當希望強調事件發生的「不可預測性」時,就可以用更準確的accident(若仍用incident,也行,只是沒了「無意為之」的意味)。即:Accident ⊂ Incident His RecklessDriving Accounted For The Accident. 言外之意:是不小心無意導致(不是成心的)。
  • 初二英語複習資料:The accident同步測試題
    If an accident happens in the street, the t ________ often stops. 2. When I walked p______ the post office, I saw my mother in it. 3. I』ll go and m_____ away the bag of rice with Lin Tao. 4.
  • Eric Clapton: Autumn Leaves
    The falling leaves drift by my windowThe autumn leaves of red and goldI see your lips, the summer kissesThe sunburned hands, I used to hold
  • Catch the leaves in autumn
    Fall is the season of leaves. Shedding their green outfits, leaves opt for a more colorful appearance when autumn comes.
  • 「法治」到底是rule of law還是rule by law?
    如果你能毫不猶豫地在rule of law和rule by law中選擇了前者,小編跪你的英語與政治雙牛!黨的十八屆四中全會已經勝利開完啦。如果對這個介詞選擇題無感的同學,建議你們熟讀一下中國媒體播發的一些英文稿件,滿篇儘是rule of law,乃腦補絕佳讀品,讀上一遍,再也不用擔心在這個說法上用錯介詞啦。
  • lot, lots, a lot, a lot of, lots of等的用法
    用於 a lot of (=lots of),意為「許多」,可用於修飾可數或不可數名詞。如:We need a lot of [lots of] money. 我們需要很多錢。He has quite a lot of [lots of] friends. 他有很多朋友。修飾主語時,謂語的數取決於它所修飾名詞的數。