The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small Minority

2021-02-21 英語閱讀

How Europe will eat Halal — Why you don’t have to smoke in the smoking section — Your food choices on the fall of the Saudi king –How to prevent a friend from working too hard –Omar Sharif 『s conversion — How to make a market collapse

The best example I know that gives insights into the functioning of a complex system is with the following situation. It suffices for an intransigent minority –a certain type of intransigent minorities –to reach a minutely small level, say three or four percent of the total population, for the entire population to have to submit to their preferences. Further, an optical illusion comes with the dominance of the minority: a naive observer would be under the impression that the choices and preferences are those of the majority. If it seems absurd, it is because our scientific intuitions aren’t calibrated for that (fughedabout scientific and academic intuitions and snap judgments; they don’t work and your standard intellectualization fails with complex systems, though not your grandmothers』 wisdom).
The main idea behind complex systems is that the ensemble behaves in way not predicted by the components. The interactions matter more than the nature of the units. Studying individual ants will never (one can safely say never for most such situations), never give us an idea on how the ant colony operates. For that, one needs to understand an ant colony as an ant colony, no less, no more, not a collection of ants. This is called an 「emergent」 property of the whole, by which parts and whole differ because what matters is the interactions between such parts. And interactions can obey very simple rules. The rule we discuss in this chapter is the minority rule.
The minority rule will show us how it all it takes is a small number of intolerant virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly.
This example of complexity hit me, ironically, as I was attending the New England Complex Systems institute summer barbecue. As the hosts were setting up the table and unpacking the drinks, a friend who was observant and only ate Kosher dropped by to say hello. I offered him a glass of that type of yellow sugared water with citric acid people sometimes call lemonade, almost certain that he would reject it owing to his dietary laws. He didn’t. He drank the liquid called lemonade, and another Kosher person commented: 「liquids around here are Kosher」. We looked at the carton container. There was a fine print: a tiny symbol, a U inside a circle, indicating that it was Kosher. The symbol will be detected by those who need to know and look for the minuscule print. As to others, like myself, I had been speaking prose all these years without knowing, drinking Kosher liquids without knowing they were Kosher liquids.

Figure 1 The lemonade container with the circled U indicating it is (literally) Kosher.

Criminals With Peanut Allergies
A strange idea hit me. The Kosher population represents less than three tenth of a percent of the residents of the United States. Yet, it appears that almost all drinks are Kosher. Why? Simply because going full Kosher allows the producer, grocer, restaurant, to not have to distinguish between Kosher and nonkosher for liquids, with special markers, separate aisles, separate inventories, different stocking sub-facilities. And the simple rule that changes the total is as follows:
A Kosher (or halal) eater will never eat nonkosher (or nonhalal) food , but a nonkosher eater isn’t banned from eating kosher.
Or, rephrased in another domain:
A disabled person will not use the regular bathroom but a nondisabled person will use the bathroom for disabled people.
Granted, sometimes, in practice, we hesitate to use the bathroom with the disabled sign on it owing to some confusion –mistaking the rule for the one for parking cars, under the belief that the bathroom is reserved for exclusive use by the handicapped.
Someone with a peanut allergy will not eat products that touch peanuts but a person without such allergy can eat items without peanut traces in them.
Which explains why it is so hard to find peanuts on airplanes and why schools are peanut-free (which, in a way, increases the number of persons with peanut allergies as reduced exposure is one of the causes behind such allergies).
Let us apply the rule to domains where it can get entertaining:
An honest person will never commit criminal acts but a criminal will readily engage in legal acts.
Let us call such minority an intransigent group, and the majority a flexible one. And the rule is an asymmetry in choices.
I once pulled a prank on a friend. Years ago when Big Tobacco were hiding and repressing the evidence of harm from secondary smoking, New York had smoking and nonsmoking sections in restaurants (even airplanes had, absurdly, a smoking section). I once went to lunch with a friend visiting from Europe: the restaurant only had availability in the smoking sections. I convinced the friend that we needed to buy cigarettes as we had to smoke in the smoking section. He complied.
Two more things. First, the geography of the terrain, that is, the spatial structure, matters a bit; it makes a big difference whether the intransigents are in their own district or are mixed with the rest of the population. If the people following the minority rule lived in Ghettos, with their separate small economy, then the minority rule would not apply. But, when a population has an even spatial distribution, say the ratio of such a minority in a neighborhood is the same as that in the village, that in the village is the same as in the county, that in the county is the same as that in state, and that in the sate is the same as nationwide, then the (flexible) majority will have to submit to the minority rule. Second, the cost structure matters quite a bit. It happens in our first example that making lemonade compliant with Kosher laws doesn’t change the price by much, not enough to justify inventories. But if the manufacturing of Kosher lemonade cost substantially more, then the rule will be weakened in some nonlinear proportion to the difference in costs. If it cost ten times as much to make Kosher food, then the minority rule will not apply, except perhaps in some very rich neighborhoods.
Muslims have Kosher laws so to speak, but these are much narrower and apply only to meat. For Muslim and Jews have near-identical slaughter rules (all Kosher is halal for most Sunni Muslims, or was so in past centuries, but the reverse is not true). Note that these slaughter rules are skin-in-the-game driven, inherited from the ancient Eastern Mediterranean [discussed in Chapter] Greek and Semitic practice to only worship the gods if one has skin in the game, sacrifice meat to the divinity, and eat what’s left. The Gods do not like cheap signaling.
Now consider this manifestation of the dictatorship of the minority. In the United Kingdom, where the (practicing) Muslim population is only three to four percent, a very high number of the meat we find is halal. Close to seventy percent of lamb imports from New Zealand are halal. Close to ten percent of the chain Subway carry halal-only stores (meaning no pork), in spite of the high costs from the loss of business of nonpork stores. The same holds in South Africa where, with the same proportion of Muslims, a disproportionately higher number of chicken is Halal certified. But in the U.K. and other Christian countries, halal is not neutral enough to reach a high level, as people may use other people’s religious norms. For instance, the 7th Century Christian Arab poet Al-Akhtal made a point to never eat halal meat, in his famous defiant poem boasting his Christianity: 「I do not eat sacrificial flesh」
One can expect the same rejection of religious norms to take place in the West as the Muslim populations in Europe grows.

Figure 2 Renormalization group: steps one through three (start from the top): Four boxes containing four boxes, with one of the boxes pink at step one, with successive applications of the minority rule.

So the minority rule may produce a larger share of halal food in the stores than warranted by the proportion of halal eaters in the population, but with a headwind somewhere because some people may have a taboo against Moslem food. But with some non-religious Kashrut rules, so to speak, the share can be expected converge to closer to a hundred percent (or some high number). In the U.S. and Europe, 「organic」 food companies are selling more and more products precisely because of the minority rule and because ordinary and unlabeled food may be seen by some to contain pesticides, herbicides, and transgenic genetically modified organisms, 「GMOs」 with, according to them, unknown risks. (What we call GMOs in this context means transgenic food, entailing the transfer of genes from a foreign organism or species). Or it could be for some existential reasons, cautious behavior, or Burkean conservatism –some may not want to venture too far too fast from what their grandparents ate. Labeling something 「organic」 is a way to say that it contains no transgenic GMOs.
In promoting genetically modified food via all manner of lobbying, purchasing of congressmen, and overt scientific propaganda (with smear campaigns against such persons as yours truly), the big agricultural companies foolishly believed that all they needed was to win the majority. No, you idiots. As I said, your snap 「scientific」 judgment is too naive in these type of decisions. Consider that transgenic-GMO eaters will eat nonGMOs, but not the reverse. So it may suffice to have a tiny, say no more than five percent of evenly spatially distributed population of non-genetically modified eaters for the entire population to have to eat non-GMO food. How? Say you have a corporate event, a wedding, or a lavish party to celebrate the fall of the Saudi Arabian regime, the bankruptcy of the rent-seeking investment bank Goldman Sachs, or the public reviling of Ray Kotcher, chairman of Ketchum the public relation firm that smears scientists and scientific whistleblowers on behalf of big corporations. Do you need to send a questionnaire asking people if they eat or don’t eat transgenic GMOs and reserve special meals accordingly? No. You just select everything non-GMO, provided the price difference is not consequential. And the price difference appears to be small enough to be negligible as (perishable) food costs in America are largely, about up to eighty or ninety percent, determined by distribution and storage, not the cost at the agricultural level. And as organic food (and designations such as 「natural」) is in higher demand, from the minority rule, distribution costs decrease and the minority rule ends up accelerating in its effect.
Big Ag (the large agricultural firms) did not realize that this is the equivalent of entering a game in which one needed to not just win more points than the adversary, but win ninety-seven percent of the total points just to be safe. It is strange, once again, to see Big Ag who spent hundreds of millions of dollars on research cum smear campaigns, with hundreds of these scientists who think of themselves as more intelligent than the rest of the population, miss such an elementary point about asymmetric choices.
Another example: do not think that the spread of automatic shifting cars is necessarily due to the majority of drivers initially preferring automatic; it can just be because those who can drive manual shifts can always drive automatic, but the reciprocal is not true [1].
The method of analysis employed here is called renormalization group, a powerful apparatus in mathematical physics that allows us to see how things scale up (or down). Let us examine it next –without mathematics.

to be continued ...

長按識別二維碼添加關注


微信號:englishespresso

Reading a better world



相關焦點

  • minority什麼意思
    minority什麼意思單詞解析min,最小值,也就是mini,表示小的前綴。更多例子還有:diminish, minion, miniature, etc.minority 少數民族學單詞,只記住意思可不行,會用才行,小夥伴們可以在評論區造句,我們一起學習哦!
  • Most people ready for small-engine cars
    Sky-high gasoline prices are fostering demand for gas-saving small-engine cars.Some fear the new standards featuring good performance, high energy efficiency and low emissions will set technical barriers for small cars and be the death knell for some 60 percent of small-engine
  • wins伺服器架設
     沒有使用wins時,默認節點類型:b-node2. 資料庫默認存放位置:\windows\system32\wins,wins.mdb是重要的文件2.>② 進入DOS命令行界面③ 運行以下命令:1) cd \windows\system32\wins2) Jetpack wins.mdb temp.mdb(temp.mdb
  • Work on private trade and minority products in Nanning forges...
    It is recently learned from the training class for the work on private trade and minority products in 2020 that this work has forged ahead steadily in Nanning.
  • A small fortune
    Reader question:Glen spent a small fortune on a tour round the world.Could you explain 「a small fortune」?
  • 2 wins in 2 days.. great...
    懂球帝首頁>足球新聞> 2 wins in 2 days.. great... 2 wins in 2 days.. great... iamryanbertrand 2019-07-21 03:50 2 wins in 2 days.. great effort from the team. Onto the next, Let’s go‼️
  • 看美劇學英語:Everyone wins(雙贏)
    看美劇學英語:Everyone wins(雙贏)Example:Terrific! So everyone wins太棒了!而這個從英語到英語的「轉換能力」恰恰是我們最缺乏的,不是有沒有機會原封不動地把Everyone wins用起來的問題,我見Everyone wins時「能用上已知」英語:足夠了!
  • PTE-FIB講解 Day689.Dictatorship獨裁統治
    The intention was that the dictatorship would be temporary and that it would make it POSSIBLE to take swift and effective action to deal with an emergency.
  • Lexus to Compete in Small SUV Market
    Masahiro Kato, the General Manager of Toyota China said, ES240 which was introduced into China by Lexus in 2009, had already become the most popular model of Lexus.
  • 天天英語|Talent wins games, but teamwork……
    51Talk一句話教你說早安▽Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.
  • 英文閱讀:Small Talk
    Reader question: What's "small talk" exactly?   My comments:   Small talk is gossip, chitchat, unimportant chatter, small being the significant adjective pointing to its, well, insignificance.
  • 熟詞生義:「small beer」可不是指「小瓶啤酒」!
    大家好,今天我們那分享一個非常有用且地道的表達——small beer, 這個短語的含義不是指「小瓶啤酒」,其正確的含義是:small beer 無足輕重的人或事物The insurance premium
  • Small Talk 的正確打開方式
    今天就為大家準備了一些用於開啟聊天話題的small talk, 讓你在空氣突然安靜時稍微舒一口氣。   首先,咱們從5W要素來了解一下small talks:   WHO makes small talk?
  • small beer可不是「小啤酒」,這個俚語太有意思了!
    如果在國外,你聽到有人說「I want some small beer.」你會覺得奇怪嗎?用餐場景中,small beer 的確有指啤酒,但不是小啤酒:在英國,small beer 指的是口味比較淡的啤酒(同 light beer),不過在美語中則是表示「少量啤酒」。Anything to drink?客人就可能回答說:I'll have a small beer.
  • US richest start off small
    From paper routes to gas stations, America's richest started off small and worked their way up, forbes.com
  • Trump-backed candidates eke out small leads
    Republican candidates backed by President Donald Trump clung to small leads in closely watched races in Ohio and Kansas on Wednesday, with the narrow margins serving as encouraging
  • Chinese director wins top Asian film prize
    China's Li Yu, 32, won the prize for "Dam Street", a drama centred on the life of a young Chinese woman who falls pregnant as a high school student in a small, conservative