Seeing China's every move as geopolitics is just dead wrong

2020-12-25 中國日報網

That some people in Washington still see China-US relations as a zero-sum game is surprising, to say the least.

At a talk on Chinese foreign direct investment in Latin America held at the Atlantic Council on June 26, Brazilian Ambassador to the United States Sergio Amaral spoke very highly about China's fast-growing trade with Latin America and investment in the region.

Chinese investment, Amaral said in his keynote speech, has diversified rapidly into infrastructure and service sectors. A report released the same day by the Atlantic Council, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), in partnership with HSBC, said the same thing.

I have interviewed Amaral both in the US and Brazil and chatted with him as late as last Thursday at the Chinese embassy celebration marking the 20th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to China. As a former chairman of the Brazil-China Business Council, he is well versed in Sino-Latin American relations.

No wonder his views were corroborated at the talk by Gerardo Mato, chairman of HSBC Global Banking and Markets for the Americas, and Angel Melguizo, head of OECD's Latin American and Caribbean unit. Both praised China-Latin America relations.

However, in her speech, Claire Reade, assistant US trade representative for China from 2008 to 2014, expressed concern that the US' "little brothers" in Latin America might shift to China and claimed Beijing's involvement in the region was not as a selfless global leader but to fulfill its self-interests.

Claiming that China's move is to influence global rules, Reade said: "China talks about win-win, but many in China have zero-sum game viewpoint."

Her words reminded me of the slanderous comments about China's role in Africa and Latin America by former US president Barack Obama and secretary of state Hillary Clinton when they visited the regions a few years ago. US politicians are often critical of China's involvement in African and Latin American countries, even though the local people seem happy with it.

Reade is right that China is indeed trying to influence global rules, but only to make them better for emerging and developing countries that did not have much say in rule making in the past.

China is not selfless either; it seeks mutually beneficial ties with Latin American countries. Besides, if China were to turn all the loans into grants, Reade might then accuse it of buying influence.

Despite the geographical distance, China is quickly catching up on its relationship with Latin America. And there is no reason for US politicians to see this as China's geopolitical wrestling with the US, unless they still regard Latin American countries as their "little brothers" or their "backyard", according to the so-called Monroe Doctrine.

Latin America is big enough to accommodate China and the US. The region will benefit if both countries increase their trade and direct investment in the region. The same is true for the Asia-Pacific.

When the Pew Research Center released its survey showing a plummeting US global image at the Brookings Institution on June 27, Ely Ratner, a former Obama administration official and now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, claimed that it matters because "the US is in an emerging geopolitical competition with China".

Also, he asserted that Asia has great confidence in US democracy despite the survey results showing that 46 percent of the people polled in 37 countries disliked the US' ideas about democracy, with only 43 percent saying they liked them.

Reade and Ratner might be deeply frustrated with US President Donald Trump's policies, but to criticize China for its active and positive engagement in Latin America and the Asia-Pacific mirrors the zero-sum mentality the Obama administration exhibited in its attitude toward the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

It is okay and even welcome to criticize China if it is well-grounded. Constructive criticism will help make China and the whole world a better place. But if done with sheer speculation and such disconnect with facts, it will only discredit such criticism. This is especially true for people who claim to be China specialists.

Contact the writer at chenweihua@chinadailyusa.com

相關焦點

  • Dead air?
    He ended the conversation following some dead air by saying, 「Here’s the part where she’s blankly staring at her can of Pringles trying to figure it out herself.」
  • Not cold hearted, just less tolerance for rule-breakers
    The tragedy cost two lives, as the tiger was shot dead when zoo employees tried to rescue the man.As news of the incident spread, the majority of voices online blamed the dead man for the animal's death.
  • Trump's focus on trade deficits wrong: experts
    Economists warn that turning trade into a zero-sum balance is too simple-minded US economists believe that blaming other countries for US trade deficits is wrongheaded
  • 20 Things You'll Regret Every Time After Doing
    You'll regret every time staying at a dead-end job  Look around the office.You'll regret every time let fear dictate decisions  Just like staying in a dead-end job because you fear unemployment or think you cannot survive without another paycheck, when fear guides your
  • 英語情景口語:Seeing the doctor看醫生
    027 seeing the doctor 　　Words 　　Appointment dental surgery vaccination filling nurse infection rash injection prescription cough 　　Blood pressure
  • 英語情景口語對話:Seeing the doctor看醫生
    027 seeing the doctor 　　Words 　　Appointment dental surgery vaccination filling nurse infection rash injection prescription cough 　　Blood pressure
  • Move on rates aims at fending off risks
    The central bank's move to raise short-term interest rates on Thursday reflects Beijing's intention to fend off financial risks, a method that might be used more in the
  • What's wrong with snooker's wonder kid Ding?
    But in recent years Ding's magic touch seems to have deserted him? So what's gone wrong with the wonder kid?
  • Signature move?
    Therefore, seeing your signature, people understand that the letter is yours or that it is really you who’s signed the document, agreeing to a deal or some such.
  • He said he just wants to be your fuck-boy!
    He said he just wants to be your fuck-boy, what does it mean?
  • He's just not that into you《其實你不懂他的心》精講之二
    Conor's never gonna call you.Gigi: Oh, really. How do you know?Alex: Because I'm a guy, and it's just how we do it.Gigi: He said it was nice meeting me.
  • The Dead Club(1)
    So you』d think after seeing my fair share of emphysema cases and a battalion of concerned parents whose teenage kids have just started lighting up, that I』d despise the cigarette smoke that clings to the
  • 目錄 | Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead ·Olga Tokarczuk
    The porch light went out automatically and we walked across the crunching snow in total darkness, except for Oddball's headlamp, which pierced the pitch dark in one shifting spot, just in front of him,
  • A Theatrical Monologue: I Just Wanted to Be A Writer
    It came after me, like a dead shrimp in an unpowered freezer.The other day I saw a dead rat’s head stuck among the bars covering a whole on the ground. I thought it was dead but when my gaze looked that way, it was gone.
  • What’s whataboutism?
    What’s whataboutism exactly?My comments:You criticize someone for doing something wrong, and they say 「What about you?」
  • Just in jest
    "But that's wrong. You should try something else." "Other burgers?" "There is more to American cuisine than burgers." "Like what? French fries?
  • 中學生英語課外閱讀:Just Listen To Your Heart
    How often do you have a really strong gut instinct and it proves to be wrong? How often do you override(推翻，踐踏) that instinct and then kick yourself later on?
  • 小紅豬搶稿第111期:Dead man's sperm
    No one checks the patient’s vitals. He has been given no pain relief.The patient is dead.It is the dead man’s sperm.§Ana and Michael Clark had only been married a year when Mike got orders to ship out overseas for his fifth deployment.