北美、歐洲及亞太三個區域分開排名，數據提供方仍然來自Vault.com，主要選擇了聲望、戰略諮詢、管理諮詢、IT諮詢及人力資源諮詢等維度進行數據匯總分析。
點評：毫無懸念的MBB成為北美地區最具聲望的諮詢公司Top3（好多好多年了…），而Big4血統的諮詢公司仍然延續著過去幾年的強勢，考慮埃森哲（原安達信諮詢），IBM GBS（原PWC諮詢），10佔其6。
點評：畢業小朋友們最憧憬的」高大上「的戰略諮詢，在北美區毫無懸念…
點評：整體還是MBB PK Big4，偶爾有幾個Tier 2刷刷存在感…
點評：IT諮詢領域，IBM最近比較動蕩…貌似和A記的分差在拉大，不知道認知計算的戰略是不是可以幫大象重奪第一？Booz Allen Hamilton國內見的比較少，但是在米帝是政府的主要IT承包商…把米帝的網際網路監控捅出來的愛德華·斯諾登就是該公司的僱員。
點評：唯一的意外是Hay居然在北美的人力資源諮詢細分市場掉出了前5…
點評：看到了羅蘭貝格的回歸，相較於北美地區的業務遲遲打不開局面，作為自身大本營的歐洲地區還是穩居在最具聲望的諮詢公司之列。而Big4在歐洲的諮詢聲望與北美還是存在一定的差距。當然MBB還是MBB…
點評：同樣作為少數幾個源自歐洲的戰略諮詢公司，羅蘭貝格在歐洲地區獲得了僅次於MBB的認可程度。水房有兩個戰略諮詢業務線入圍…說好的無縫整合呢？
點評：BCG壓過了MCK獲得了歐洲最佳管理諮詢公司…大概是因為其在MBB中最良好的lifestyle風格比較受歐洲人待見？
點評：另一家源自歐洲的諮詢公司，凱捷進入本領域的前3。IBM還是很鬱悶的看著ACN登頂。話說，MCK在IT諮詢領域搞這麼高的排名是鬧哪樣…是BTO的功勞麼？
點評：第五名，小編真的念不出啊…皇上
點評：又是MBB…和Big4…為嘛要說又？
點評：亞洲人民相當認可埃森哲的戰略諮詢能力…這是什麼鬼…不過A記戰略業務最近倒是挖人蠻兇的。
點評：無
點評：印度同學很厲害的在亞太區域擠進了兩家…Tata & Infosys
點評：傳統的四大人力諮詢公司終於都進前5了…
最具聲望的諮詢公司的排名方法（來自Vault）：
Survey respondents were asked to rate each consulting firm in the survey on a scale from 1 to 10 based on prestige, with 10 being the most prestigious. Consultants were unable to rate their own firm, and they were asked to rate only those firms with which they were familiar.
Vault collected the survey results and averaged the score for each firm. The firms were then ranked, with the highest score being No. 1, down to No. 50.
Remember that Vault’s top-50 prestigious consulting firms are chosen by practicing consultants at top consulting firms. Vault does not choose or influence these rankings. The rankings measure perceived prestige (as determined by consulting professionals) and not revenue, size or lifestyle.
各個細分行業排名方法（來自Vault）：
Vault asked consultants to rank the best firms in several areas of business focus. Consultants were allowed to vote for up to three firms as the best in each area, but could NOT vote for their own firm.
via：智選堂