現代人久坐的生活方式已被證實對身體非常有害，但是，新研究發現，也許問題的關鍵不在於長時間不動，而在於坐。
坦尚尼亞的一個遊獵採集部族的人每天大部分時間都是靜止不動的，不是蹲著就是跪著，但他們卻沒有任何和久坐相關的健康問題。科學家指出，這或許意味著蹲和跪是更健康的休息或辦公姿勢。
Photo by Thao Le Hoang on Unsplash
Resting postures such as squatting or kneeling may be better for health because they require more muscle activity than sitting on a chair, researchers claim.
研究人員指出，蹲或跪這樣的休息姿勢也許更有益健康，因為這些姿勢比靜坐在椅子上需要更多肌肉活動。
The findings are based on data gathered from a hunter-gatherer population in Tanzania who wore devices that measured physical activity as well as periods of rest.
該研究發現基於從坦尚尼亞的一個遊獵採集部族收集來的數據，這個部族的人佩戴了裝置來測量他們的體力活動和休息時間。
Anthropologists from the US found that despite being sedentary for almost 10 hours each day, equivalent to clocking a shift in the office at the desk, the Hazda people appeared to lack the markers of chronic diseases associated with long periods of sitting.
美國的人類學家發現，儘管哈茲達部落的人每天靜止不動的時間將近10個小時，相當於在辦公桌前上一天班，但他們似乎沒有久坐帶來的慢性病跡象。
They believe this is down to the 『active rest postures』 used by the tribe.
人類學家認為，這是由於該部落採用的「積極休息姿勢」。
Dr David Raichlen, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Southern California’s Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, and lead author on the study, said: 『Even though there were long periods of inactivity, one of the key differences we noticed is that the Hadza are often resting in postures that require their muscles to maintain light levels of activity – either in a squat or kneeling.』
該研究的主要作者、美國南加州大學多恩西夫文理學院的生物學教授戴維·瑞奇蘭博士說：「儘管哈茲達人靜止不動的時間長，但我們注意到一個重要區別：他們經常採用需要稍微運動肌肉來保持的休息姿勢——要麼蹲著，要麼跪著。」
Prolonged sitting has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death, but according to the researchers, this contradicts the evolutionary aspect which favours strategies that conserve energy.
久坐會導致心血管疾病風險增高和死亡，但研究人員指出，這有悖於偏好保存能量策略的進化論。
Brian Wood, an anthropologist at the University of California, and one of the study authors, said: 『Preferences or behaviours that conserve energy have been key to our species』 evolutionary success.
該研究的作者之一、加州大學的人類學家布萊恩·伍德說：「保存能量的傾向或行為對於人類進化的成功很關鍵。」
『But when environments change rapidly, these same preferences can lead to less optimal outcomes. Prolonged sitting is one example.』
「但是當環境迅速變化時，這種傾向卻不會導致最佳結果。久坐就是一個例子。」
optimal[ɑptml]: adj. 最佳的；最理想的
To find out more, the researchers looked at the data from 28 Hadza adults who wore devices, known as accelerometers, for eight days and compared it with the information gathered from previous studies that measured inactivity in modern working populations.
為了進一步了解真相，研究人員查看了來自28名佩戴加速度傳感器長達八天的哈茲達成年人的數據，並將其與先前測量現代勞動人口靜止狀態的研究收集到的信息作比較。
They found that their test subjects had high levels of physical activity for just over an hour a day alongside several hours of inactivity, between nine to 10 hours a day. But despite remaining in resting postures for long periods of time, the Hazda people did not show any signs of the health conditions associated with a sedentary lifestyle.
他們發現，他們的測試對象一天從事高強度體力活動的時間剛過一小時，而不動的時間長達數小時，每天有9到10小時的（清醒）時間是靜止不動的。但是，儘管長時間保持休息姿勢，哈茲達人並沒有顯現出任何和久坐生活方式相關的健康問題的跡象。
The researchers said, it is because the Hazda squatting and kneeling uses more muscle movement than sitting on a chair.
研究人員稱，這是因為哈茲達人蹲和跪的姿勢比坐在椅子上需要更多的肌肉運動。
They believe these active rest postures may help 『protect people from the harmful effects of inactivity』.
他們認為，積極的休息姿勢也許有助於「保護人們免受靜止不動帶來的有害影響」。
Dr Raichlen said: 『Being a couch potato – or even sitting in an office chair – requires less muscle activity than squatting or kneeling.
瑞奇蘭博士說：「做一個沙發土豆——或坐在辦公椅上——需要的肌肉活動都比蹲或跪少。」
『Since light levels of muscle activity require fuel, which generally means burning fats, then squatting and kneeling postures may not be as harmful as sitting in chairs.』
「因為少量肌肉運動需要消耗能量，通常這意味著燃燒脂肪，所以蹲和跪的姿勢也許不像坐在椅子上那麼有害。」
The study is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Pnas).
該研究發表在期刊《美國國家科學院院刊》上。
英文來源：Metro
翻譯&編輯：丹妮
來源：中國日報網