Sex with wife without consent not rape: Gujarat HC
古吉拉特邦高等法院：婚內強姦不算強姦
TNN | Updated: Apr 3, 2018, 10:24 IST
AHMEDABAD: The Gujarat HCruled on Monday that a wife cannot charge her husband with marital rape even if the man has sex with her without her consent if she is above 18 years of age.
艾哈邁達巴德：古吉拉特邦高等法院周一裁定，如果妻子已年滿18周歲，就不能控告丈夫婚內強姦，即使丈夫沒有徵得她的同意強行發生性關係。
Justice J B Pardiwala observed that the offence of rape by a husband is not an offence punishable under IPC Section 375 + , which defines rape. He lamented the position of a law which does not enable a woman to prosecute her husband for rape and called for legal provisions so that a woman can protect her body the way she has been enabled to protect her other rights.
J B Pardiwala法官注意到，根據IPC第375條關於強姦的定義，丈夫的強姦行為不屬於可判刑的罪行。他對這一條法律的立場表示遺憾，該法律不允許女性起訴丈夫強姦，同時呼籲通過立法使女性能夠保護自己的身體，就像保護女性的其他權利一樣。
資料圖（圖文無關）
The HC quoted, in great detail, legal provisions existing in countries across the world on marital rape and observed that the legislature must criminalise the offence. He said the mere apprehension of its misuse by "unscrupulous" women should not be a deterrent to enacting legislation to protect women battered by marital rape, which is rampant in India. The HC said a wife can initiate criminal proceedings against her husband for unnatural sex under IPC Section 377. Consent is not a determining criterion in such a case. Any offence which is against the order of nature and can be described as carnal penetration would constitute an offence under IPC Sec 377.
高等法院詳細地引用了世界各國關於婚內強姦的法律條文，並指出立法機關必須將這一罪行定為犯罪。法官表示，他說，如果僅僅是擔心「肆無忌憚」的婦女濫用權利，也不應該妨礙立法保護遭受婚姻強姦的婦女，這在印度非常猖獗。高等法院表示，妻子可以根據IPC第377條對丈夫提起刑事訴訟。在這種情況下，同意不是決定性的標準。任何違反自然秩序的罪行，可被稱為「肉體滲透」，將構成IPC第377條規定的罪行。
However, in a marital relationship, "except the sexual perversions of sodomy, buggery and bestiality, all other sexual perversions would not fall within the sweep of Sec 377 of the IPC", the HC said and observed that the charge of forced oral sex levelled by the woman in this case would not attract the charge of sodomy. The HC added that forcing a wife to have sex would attract the charge of outraging the modesty of woman under IPC Sec 354.
然而，在婚姻關係中，「除了驚世駭俗的雞姦和獸奸性變態行為外，所有其他的性變態行為都不屬於IPC第377條所規定的範疇。」高等法院表示，在本案中，女子指控男子強迫其進行口交尚未達到雞姦的程度。高院補充道，強迫妻子發生性行為違反了IPC第354條的規定。
譯文來源：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/44582.html
印度時報網友評論：
Saravanan Shanmugam
108
Saravanan-6 hours ago
And what is the proof that there is no consent from wife? And can we say that wife has raped husband if there was no consent from husband. If the husband/wife is not willing to have sex with each other, then better allow him/her to have it with someone else and don't call it as extra marital affairs as the other person is the reason for this act. Well, girls would think how they can make money out of it. All cheap money minded.
有沒有證據證明妻子沒有同意？是不是也可以說，沒有丈夫的同意，妻子也強姦了丈夫。如果丈夫或妻子不願意和對方發生性關係，那麼最好允許他或她和別人一起OOXX，不要把這叫做婚外情，因為這是對方造成的。好吧，女孩們會想怎麼從中賺錢。見錢眼開。
Amit Ghosh
7348
Amit-Bangalore-4 hours ago
feminists groups are putting pressure on govt and courts to make marital rape so that more misuse of law can happen.
女權團體正在向政府和法院施壓，要求他們通過婚內強姦立法，那麼還會發生更多濫用法律的事。
[!--empirenews.page--]
Yadav
525
Yadav-7 hours ago
If you have a fight with your wife,
file for divorce,
if you want to break live in relationship,
if you want to leave your girl friend .
Whatever you do , you will be slaped with rape assault charges.
如果你和妻子吵架了，想離婚，
如果你想分手，
如果你想離開你的女朋友。
無論你做什麼，你都可能被指控強姦。
Rakesh Gupta
3102
Rakesh Gupta-5 hours ago
if you cannot meet the needs of the partner, why are you together. divorce and get on with your life separately
如果你不能滿足伴侶的需要，為什麼要在一起。離婚，過你自己的吧。
Piyush
1479
Piyush-4 hours ago
those whores who do not want even their husband to have sex with them should not marry at all.Who else do they want to be screwed by???
那些不跟自己的丈夫發生性關係的女人，根本不應該結婚。她們是想耍誰？
Ivan Bigger
25429
Ivan Bigger-Trump Manor-4 hours ago
So the other side is men have to get a notarized consent form signed by wife before getting into bed with her... wonderful...
所以呢，男人得拿到妻子的同意書公證後，才能和她上床。。。真好。。。
Vaibhav
1755
Vaibhav-New Delhi-4 hours ago
If wife refuses to consummate marriage completly, on pretext that husband wants to Rape her. Will the husband allowed to take divorce or he will charged for attempt to rape his wife.
如果妻子不想過了，就以丈夫想要強姦她為藉口。那麼丈夫是離婚呢？還是要被指控強姦呢？
Sri K
315
Sri K-7 hours ago
Looks like no one reads the complete article . People become enraged at misleading title. The Judge condemned marital rape and said that present laws do not cover it. New laws should be passed to cover the crime. Until then, all marital rape cases will not be punishable due to loopholes in the present law.
看來沒人把文章看完，人們對誤導性的標題感到憤怒。法官譴責了婚內強姦，並指出目前的法律並沒有涵蓋這一點。應該通過新的法律來審判這一罪行。在此之前，所有的婚內強姦案都會因現行法律的漏洞而免受懲罰。
Truth Speaker
3102
Truth Speaker-India-5 hours ago
Idiotic. The same judges say that sex is the right of the man and Women in married life. Denying it leads to divorce. Why this women want to live with a man whom she feels that he is raping her. Instead get divorce and live a life you want. Why do you want to ruin your life and also the life of your husband.
太蠢了。。有些法官認為，性是男性和女性在婚姻生活中的權利，否認會導致離婚。為什麼這個女人要和一個她認為是強姦犯的男人生活在一起。離婚吧，過你自己想過的日子。你為什麼要毀了你和你丈夫2個人的生活呢？
10 Barns
1608
Barns-8 hours ago
hail Gujrat HC.
該死的，古吉拉特邦高等法院
Global Indian
235
Global-5 hours ago
how should tree husband protect himself. how does he record he had the consent. judge should also outlined this. i am I favour of martial rape should be punishable to protect the women but how to protect man from being punished should be outlined as well.
丈夫該如何保護自己呢？他怎麼證明獲得了妻子的同意。法官也應該說明這一點。我贊成婚內強姦應該受到懲罰以保護女性，但是如何保護男人免受懲罰，也應該提到。
[!--empirenews.page--]
Vijay Banga
7093
Vijay Banga-new delhi-4 hours ago
There are many strange things happening in Gujrat but accepted by society as normal, life goes on.
古吉拉特邦總有很多稀奇古怪的事情發生。。生活讓在繼續。
Rakesh Gupta
3102
Rakesh Gupta-6 hours ago
if you are not compatible, just get divorce, those who are creating this kind of news are not only content in dividing the society in caste and religion but now want to destory the institution of marriage. why would people want to get married if they are not interested in each other.
如果你們不能和睦相處，那就離婚吧。寫這種新聞的人不僅劃分不同社會等級和宗教，還想毀掉婚姻制度。如果人們對彼此不感興趣，為什麼還要結婚呢？
Deepak B Mhalas
21786
Deepak B Mhalas-Shivaji Park Dadar Mumbai-3 hours ago
Its really sad such type of people are taking such issues to court. If sex after marriage can be considered as rape then whats the use of marriage.
居然有人將這種事鬧上法庭，真是可悲。如果婚後OOXX被當成強姦，那麼還要婚姻幹什麼？
Harry Das
12887
Harry Das-N York-9 hours ago
Barbaric High Court! It is rape! The judges who passed such heinous judgement legalising rape needs to be impeached.
野蠻的高等法院！這是強姦！應該彈劾那些判處這種令人髮指的罪行無罪的法官們。
Naresh Khullar
70
Naresh Khullar-1 hour ago
Boys are becoming afraid to marry due to present laws favouring women and if sex after marriage becomes rape on wife says so then the institution of marriage is doomed
現行法律偏袒女性，男孩們越來越害怕結婚了。如果婚後跟妻子OOXX，變成強姦了，那婚姻制度就完蛋了。
Niranjan Solanki
19126
Niranjan Solanki-India-3 hours ago
It is sad that a man forces his wife for sex even when she is not feeling like it. It may not be rape in the legal sense, BUT it is a rape in moral sense. Sex is an act that has to be enjoyed by both parties and not just by husband. If the wife has a problem, the husband should not force himself upon her. That is moral act. BUT, unfortunately, in our patriarchal society, we assume that wife has to obey the husband no matter what. I hope the thinking would change with the new generation!
真令人難過，一個男人在妻子不願意的情況下，還是強迫她。從法律上講，這可能不是強姦，但這是一種道德上的強姦。性是一種雙方共同享受的行為，而不僅僅是丈夫。如果妻子不願意，丈夫不應該強迫她。這是道德的行為。但是，不幸的是，我們的父權社會認定妻子必須服從丈夫。我希望新一代的思想會改變！
Jona Sangma
33
Jona Sangma-1 hour ago
The judge is wise and learned
法官很睿智、很博學
Amitesh Pandey
807
Amitesh Pandey-2 hours ago
Being married in India does imply that there is implied consent to have sex according to the law and consent of the society as well according to cultural point of view... If a women does not want to have sex then there is no point in continuing the marriage.. they should take divorce..
在印度，結婚意味著默許性行為……如果一個女人不願意，那麼婚姻是沒有意義的。離了吧
20 Suresh Gopi
2491
Suresh-2 hours ago
I don't agree with marital rapes, but most of the women abuses these provisions to take revenge on husband's who on most of the occasions wouldn't have committed any such crimes
我不同意婚內強姦，大多數女兒濫用法律是為了報復丈夫，大多數丈夫是不會犯下這樣的罪行的。
Amit Thackrey
18784
Amit Thackrey-Mumbai-8 hours ago
What is the point of marriage when you cannot rape your wife ?
如果不能強暴自己的老婆，結婚的意義是什麼？
[!--empirenews.page--]
Deependra Chamyal
2107
deependra chamyal-1 hour ago
I thought NO means NO. Even if it''s your spouse
我覺得，不願意就是不願意。即使是你的配偶。
Universal Universal-Singapore-3 hours ago
Marriage or no marriage, when a woman says no to sex, it ,means NO. Period. HC judge needs his head examined!
不管結婚與否，如果一個女人說了，不，那就不行。高院法官的腦子該去看醫生了。
Shailen
4857
Shailen-KaruNaadu-3 hours ago
If wife had problems with husband, better she should have sleot separately or in her parents house... Problem with few women is only "they" feel that "their" rights r violated, better stay single rather destroying the concept of marriage and family..!!!
如果妻子和丈夫出現了問題，最好分開吧。少數女性的問題是「她們」覺得「她們」的權利被侵犯了，還是做一隻單身狗吧，免得破壞婚姻和家庭的觀念…！！！
Vijay Banga
7094
Vijay Banga-new delhi-5 hours ago
Gujrat has ,''Friendship Agreement'', one can have multiple wives while polygamy is a crime.
古吉拉特邦有所謂的「夥伴協議」， 一個男人可以有很多妻子，但一妻多夫是犯罪。
Sand Piper
6868
Sand Piper-Brahmand-1 hour ago
Foolish argument. One has to respect the other''s individuality and privacy (be he/she a spouse) amongst other things. One cannot and should not force himself or herself on the other (even within a marriage). If the Males thinks that it is his Right to force his wife into fulfilling his desires, THIS ''right'' is misplaced. It reeks of male chauvinism. However, the opposite is also true. Respect and cordiality for the other are the bedrock of happy married life.
愚蠢的爭論。一個人必須尊重配偶的個性和隱私。一個人不能也不應該強迫對方（就算是婚姻關係）。如果男性認為他有權利強迫妻子滿足自己的欲望，那麼這種「權利」是錯誤的。它散發出男性沙文主義的味道。然而，反過來也是正確的。相互尊重是幸福婚姻生活的基石。
Bobby Garewal
1795
Bobby Garewal-Chandigarh-1 hour ago
Wedlock guarantees satisfactory sex life between husband and wife. There is no need for consent from either of them. Sex is part and parcel of marred life so where is the question of consent?
婚姻保證夫妻之間OOXX的權利。不需要任何一方的同意。性是婚姻的一部分，還要同意什麼？
Kiran Kumar Kiran Kumar-Mumbai-1 hour ago
Great. So according to Indian courts, there is nothing called Marital rapes.
Just for information, marital rape is illegal in all 50 states of USA.
太好了。所以根據印度法院的說法，根本沒有所謂的婚內強姦。
僅就信息而言，婚內強姦在美國的所有50個州都是犯法的。
Divya Sharma Divya Sharma-1 hour ago
Non sence ... so same applied if the wife rape her hubby????
沒道理。。。。所以，妻子強姦丈夫也是可以的？？
Subbu India
745
Subbu India-Bengal-3 hours ago
We are in the days when SC has to say what a man and a woman will do in their married life.
當今時代，高等法院必須說一下，婚姻中的男人、女人應該做些什麼。。