TRANSFUSION MEDICINE| SEPTEMBER 10, 2020
HIV incidence in US first-time blood donors and transfusion risk with a 12-month deferral for men who have sex with menEduard Grebe, Michael P. Busch, Edward P. Notari, Roberta Bruhn, Claire Quiner, Daniel Hindes, Mars Stone, Sonia Bakkour, Hong Yang, Phillip Williamson, Debra Kessler, Rita Reik, Susan L. Stramer, Simone A. Glynn, Steven A. Anderson, Alan E. Williams, Brian Custer for the Transfusion-Transmissible Infections Monitoring System
Blood (2020) 136 (11): 1359–1367.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020007003
Key PointsHIV incidence in first-time donors was similar before and after implementation of the 12-month MSM deferral, both overall and in males.
The residual risk of HIV transfusion transmission for components sourced from first-time donors was low and did not change significantly.
AbstractIn 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration published revised guidance that recommended a change in blood donor deferral of men who have sex with men (MSM) from an indefinite to a 12-month deferral since the donor last had sex with a man. We assessed whether HIV incidence in first-time blood donors or associated transfusion risk increased. Donations in 4 major blood collection organizations were monitored for 15 months before and 2 years after implementation of the 12-month MSM deferral policy. HIV-positive donations were classified as recently acquired or long-term using a recent infection testing algorithm and incidence in both periods estimated. Residual transfusion transmission risk was estimated by multiplying incidence by the length of the infectious window period. The latter was estimated using a model based on infectious dose and the sensitivity of nucleic acid testing. Factors associated with incident infection in each period were assessed using Poisson regression. Overall HIV incidence in first-time donors before implementation of the 12-month MSM deferral was estimated at 2.62 cases per 100 000 person-years (105 PY) (95% credible interval [CI], 1.53-3.93 cases/105 PY), and after implementation at 2.85 cases/105 PY (95% CI, 1.96-3.93 cases/105 PY), with no statistically significant change. In male first-time donors, the incidence difference was 0.93 cases/105 PY (95% CI, −1.74-3.58 cases/105 PY). The residual risk of HIV transfusion transmission through components sourced from first-time donors was estimated at 0.32 transmissions per million (106) packed red blood cell transfusions (95% CI, 0.29-0.65 transmissions/106 transfusions) before and 0.35 transmissions/106 transfusions (95% CI, 0.31-0.65 transmissions/106 transfusions) after implementation. The difference was not statistically significant. Factors associated with incident infection were the same in each period. We observed no increase in HIV incidence or HIV transfusion transmission risk after implementation of a 12-month MSM deferral policy.
Subjects:
Transfusion Medicine
Topics:
blood donors, donors, hiv, infections, men who have sex with men, transfusion, hiv seropositivity
REFERENCES1.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products: Guidance for Industry. December 2015. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2015-D-1211-0099. Accessed 21 September 2019.
2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products: Draft Guidance for Industry. May 2015. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2015-D-1211-0002. Accessed 20 April 2020.
3.Custer B, Stramer SL, Glynn S, Williams AE, Anderson SA. Transfusion-transmissible infection monitoring system: a tool to monitor changes in blood safety. Transfusion. 2016;56(6 pt 2):1499-1502.
4.Steele WR, Dodd RY, Notari EP, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus in United States blood donations, 2015 to 2019: The Transfusion‐Transmissible Infections Monitoring System (TTIMS) [published online ahead of print 2020]. Transfusion. 2020.
5.Weusten J, Vermeulen M, van Drimmelen H, Lelie N. Refinement of a viral transmission risk model for blood donations in seroconversion window phase screened by nucleic acid testing in different pool sizes and repeat test algorithms. Transfusion. 2011;51(1):203-215.
6.Wei X, Liu X, Dobbs T, et al. Development of two avidity-based assays to detect recent HIV type 1 seroconversion using a multisubtype gp41 recombinant protein. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2010;26(1):61-71.
7.Kassanjee R, McWalter TA, Bärnighausen T, Welte A. A new general biomarker-based incidence estimator. Epidemiology. 2012;23(5):721-728.
8.Grebe E, Murphy G, Keating SM, et al. Impact of HIV-1 subtype and sex on sedia limiting antigen avidity assay performance [CROI Abstract 942]. In Special Issue: Abstracts From the 2019 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Top Antivir Med. 2019;27(suppl 1):483.
9.Reed JF III. Better binomial confidence intervals. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6(1):153-161.
10.Belov AA, Yang H, Forshee RA, et al. Dose-response modelling of the transfusion transmission of HIV [published online ahead of print]. Transfusion. 2020.
11.Vermeulen M, Chowdhury D, Swanevelder R, et al. HIV incidence in South African blood donors from 2012 to 2016: a comparison of statistical models [published online ahead of print 6 August 2020]. Vox Sang. doi:10.1111/vox.12987.
12.US Census Bureau. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Published 2020. Accessed 20 April 2020.
13.Bruhn R, Lelie N, Custer B, Busch M, Kleinman S; International NAT Study Group. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus RNA and antibody in first-time, lapsed, and repeat blood donations across five international regions and relative efficacy of alternative screening scenarios. Transfusion. 2013;53(10 pt 2):2399-2412.
14.Gen-Probe. Procleix Ultrio Plus Assay [manufacturer’s instructions]. 2012. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/LicensedProductsBLAs/BloodDonorScreening/InfectiousDisease/UCM092120.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2019.
15.Pillonel J, Pelat C, Tiberghien P, et al. The evolving blood donor deferral policy for men who have sex with men: impact on the risk of HIV transmission by transfusion in France. Transfusion. 2020;60(3):525-534.
16.O』Brien SF, Grégoire Y, Pillonel J, et al; Surveillance, Risk Assessment and Policy Sub-group of the ISBT Transfusion Transmitted Diseases Working Party. HIV residual risk in Canada under a three-month deferral for men who have sex with men. Vox Sang. 2020;115(2):133-139.
17.Sturrock BR, Mucklow S. What is the evidence for the change in the blood-donation deferral period for high-risk groups and does it go far enough? Clin Med (Lond). 2018;18(4):304-307.
18.Dodd RY, Crowder LA, Haynes JM, Notari EP, Stramer SL, Steele WR. Screening blood donors for HIV, HCV, and HBV at the American Red Cross: 10-year trends in prevalence, incidence, and residual risk, 2007 to 2016. Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34(2):81-93.
19.Zou S, Notari EP 4th, Stramer SL, Wahab F, Musavi F, Dodd RY; ARCNET Research Group. Patterns of age- and sex-specific prevalence of major blood-borne infections in United States blood donors, 1995 to 2002: American Red Cross blood donor study. Transfusion. 2004;44(11):1640-1647.
20.Zou S, Stramer SL, Dodd RY. Donor testing and risk: current prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of transfusion-transmissible agents in US allogeneic donations. Transfus Med Rev. 2012;26(2):119-128.
21.Crowder LA, Steele WR, Notari EP 4th, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of human immunodeficiency virus infection in blood donors in the Southeastern United States. Transfusion. 2017;57(2):404-411.
22.Trinh MH, Agénor M, Austin SB, Jackson CL. Health and healthcare disparities among U.S. women and men at the intersection of sexual orientation and race/ethnicity: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):964.
23.Sheehan DM, Trepka MJ, Fennie KP, Prado G, Ibanez G, Maddox LM. Racial/ethnic disparities in delayed HIV diagnosis among men who have sex with men, Florida, 2000-2014. AIDS Care. 2017;29(3):311-318.
24.Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341-348.
25.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention. HIV in the Southern United States. Atlanta, GA, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/policies/cdc-hiv-in-the-south-issue-brief.pdf. Accessed 11 December 2019.
26.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2018 (Preliminary). Atlanta, GA, 2019. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Accessed 11 December 2019.
27.Stramer SL, Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Nucleic Acid Test Study Group. Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid-amplification testing. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(8):760-768.
28.Yang H, Anderson SA, Forshee R, Williams A, Epstein JS, Marks PW. Modeling complete removal of risk assessment questions in the USA predicts the risk of HIV exposure in blood recipients could increase despite the use of nucleic acid testing. Vox Sang. 2016;110(4):324-328.
29.Jones JM, Sapiano MRP, Savinkina AA, et al. Slowing decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States - 2017. Transfusion. 2020;60(suppl 2):S1-S9.
30.Cerus Corporation. INTERCEPT® Blood System for Platelets – Small Volume (SV) Processing Set [manufacturer’s instructions]. Concord, CA. 2016. https://www.fda.gov/media/90073/download. Accessed 18 June 2020.
31.Custer B, Quiner C, Haaland R, et al. HIV antiretroviral therapy and prevention use in US blood donors: a new blood safety concern. Blood. 2020;136(11):1351-1358.
This program is developed by Focus Insight with the permission of American Society of Hematology, Inc. The content are excerpted from the journal Blood. Copyright © 2019 The American Society of Hematology. All rights reserved. 「American Society of Hematology」, 「ASH」 and the ASH Logo are registered trademarks of the American Society of Hematology.