今天看到一微信公眾號的文章，言辭鑿鑿，說不能相信簡體中文報導。
感興趣的可以自己去看
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Na6yf-d9IsPsoigoEeBqFQ
裡面最關鍵是這段
那麼我們來打開這個網頁，看看說了什麼？
https://norwaytoday.info/news/photo-67-year-old-svein-andersen-is-the-first-norwegian-to-receive-the-corona-vaccine/
連結大家自己去看
我複製和翻譯一下英文到下面：
POSTED BY: ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27. DECEMBER 2020
67-year-old nursing home resident Svein Andersen at Ellingsrudhjemmet in Oslo is the first person to receive the corona vaccine in Norway.
Nurse Maria Golding at Ellingsrudhjemmet will administer the vaccine.
Doctor Ingvild Glende Svanstrøm will also be involved in the process.
The first 10,000 vaccine doses arrived in Norway on December 26 and will be given to around 5,000 people, who will receive one dose now and one dose in three weeks, the Ministry of Health and Care Services announced.
Sunday is also World Pandemic Prevention Day.
Nursing home residents in seven municipalities in Eastern Norway will get the honor of being the first 5,000.
In total, just under 35,000 doses will arrive in Norway before the New Year. After that, there will be weekly deliveries of approximately 40,000 doses.
Nursing home residents first in line
Nursing home residents across the country are currently first in line to get the vaccine, followed by people over the age of 75.
The third category in the vaccine queue includes people between the ages of 65 and 74, as well as people between the ages of 18 and 64 with serious underlying diseases.
The vaccine must be taken in two doses at 21-day intervals to give the full effect.
The first dose of the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine was administered in Mjölby in Östergötland.
91-year-old Gun-Britt Johansson at the nursing home Boken was first out in the queue, SVT reports.
© NTB Scanpix / #Norway Today
照片：67歲的斯維因-安德森是第一個接受電暈疫苗的挪威人。
發布者：ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27: ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27. 2020年12月27日
奧斯陸Ellingsrudhjemmet的67歲的養老院居民Svein Andersen是挪威第一個接受電暈疫苗的人。
Ellingsrudhjemmet的護士Maria Golding將為其注射疫苗。
Ingvild Glende Svanstrøm醫生也將參與這一過程。
衛生和護理服務部宣布，首批1萬支疫苗已於12月26日運抵挪威，將為約5000人接種，他們將在現在和三周內各接種一劑。
周日也是 "世界大流行病預防日"。
挪威東部7個城市的養老院居民將有幸成為首批5000人。
總共不到35000劑將在新年前抵達挪威。此後，每周將有約4萬劑的運送量。
養老院的居民最先排隊
目前，全國各地的養老院住戶都是最先排隊接種疫苗的人群，其次是75歲以上的人群。
第三類疫苗排隊人群包括65歲至74歲的人群，以及18歲至64歲患有嚴重基礎疾病的人群。
該疫苗必須分兩次使用，間隔21天才能充分發揮作用。
輝瑞和BioNTech公司的第一劑疫苗是在Östergötland的Mjölby接種的。
據SVT報導，養老院Boken的91歲的Gun-Britt Johansson是第一個排隊的人。
© NTB Scanpix / #Norway Today
就上面的文字，然後大家再對比下這麼大段的紅字。
Nursing home residents first in line
養老院的居民首先要排隊
Nursing home residents across the country are currently first in line to get the vaccine, followed by people over the age of 75.
目前，全國各地的養老院住戶都是最先排隊接種疫苗的人群，其次是75歲以上的人群。
The third category in the vaccine queue includes people between the ages of 65 and 74, as well as people between the ages of 18 and 64 with serious underlying diseases.
第三類疫苗排隊人群包括65歲至74歲的人群，以及18歲至64歲患有嚴重基礎疾病的人群。
The vaccine must be taken in two doses at 21-day intervals to give the full effect.
疫苗必須分兩次使用，每次間隔21天，才能充分發揮作用。
你特麼截圖的內容，是你說的這個意思嗎？
你自己添加了那麼一堆內容，對比一下好麼？
他這一堆紅字，有哪些內容是我沒找到「出處」的呢
1、死了的是臨終關懷機構的晚期患者，沒看到西方媒體報導
2、西方媒體報導死亡病人是超過80歲，被作者改成85歲
3、老人優先注射（目前只發現挪威第一批是這樣，第二批就不是了，目前挪威已經注射了42000人了，其他國家不是）
4、最開始是注射了1萬人而不是「兩萬多人」，
然後作者又來了個評論
作者估計忘了，在挪威發布死亡消息的時候，就已經確認了其中13人是因為副作用太嚴重導致死亡。
在新的這段內容裡面，作者又一次充滿了猜想。目前的公開信息中，西方疫苗注射順序是這樣：
In line with planning in the US, British front-line healthcare workers, care home residents, the very elderly and people with underlying conditions that make them particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 complications are expected to get the first doses of the vaccine.
與美國的規劃一致，英國的前線醫護人員、護理院居民、非常年長的老人和有基礎疾病的人，使他們特別容易受到COVID-19併發症的影響，預計將獲得首批疫苗。
被作者變成了「80歲以上，虛弱人群」，年歲都排出來了。
所以，說瞎話，真的不好！
實際上，西方這次導致老年人大量死亡，其實就是個事故。
根子不在挪威，而是在疫苗公司。輝瑞的疫苗試驗，根本沒老年人數據。
While I perfectly agree that we need full data release for those trials, I find it strange that he only mentions the Oxford/AZ in passing, for which much less and much more disconcerting data is published, changing after the political need and pandemic situation. For the less effective (62%) Oxford vaccine with half the number of participants (is also if vaccinated volunteers), 87% were under 55, and similar percentages were white, all healthy, and there is no data, how effective this vaccine is in over 65s. The others have a proven efficacy in older people. So, why you vaccinate over 70s with the vaccine with no data for its efficacy for that age group and make unsubstantiated claims that they are 70% protected after one dose for at least 12 weeks suggests that price, supply and logistics are the main criteria for the choice, NOT the protection of the vulnerable from severe disease or death. We need proper publication of all trials and the dosage/timing regime, which has turned out most effective.
雖然我完全同意我們需要全面公布這些試驗的數據，但我覺得很奇怪，他只順便提到了牛津/AZ，對於這些試驗，公布的數據要少得多，也多得多，令人不安，在政治需要和疫情之後，就會發生變化。對於效果較差（62%）的牛津疫苗，參與人數只有一半（也是如果接種志願者），87%的人在55歲以下，類似比例的人都是白人，都是健康人，沒有數據，這種疫苗在65歲以上的人中效果如何。其他的對老年人有療效。所以，為什麼你給70歲以上的老年人接種疫苗，卻沒有數據顯示其對該年齡組的療效，並毫無根據地聲稱他們在接種一劑疫苗至少12周後就能得到70%的保護，這說明價格、供應和物流是選擇疫苗的主要標準，而不是保護弱勢群體免受嚴重疾病或死亡的傷害。我們需要適當公布所有試驗和劑量/時間制度，哪種制度最有效。
這也是為什麼挪威死亡事件出來，引發爆炸性關注的原因
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/944544/COVID-19_mRNA_Vaccine_BNT162b2__UKPAR___PFIZER_BIONTECH__15Dec2020.pdf
輝瑞公司的報告！
所以啊，還是那句話，英文不好，在闢謠的同時，請不要造謠，更不要洗地。