Ex-PornHub moderators reveal life inside explicit video site

Press "PandaGuides" above to follow us!

Former PornHub moderators have lifted the lid on life at the world's largest online adult entertainment website, currently being sued for $80million over alleged 'sex trafficking'.

Workers at MindGeek, PornHub's parent company based in Montreal, Canada, would allegedly watch up to 1,200 videos a day, spending hours categorizing and tagging sex acts and fetishes as well as reviewing 'suspicious' content, from puppies being kicked to death, to child abuse, rape and incest. 

Pornhub, which had 42 billion views in 2019, was considered the 'breadwinner' in a group of adult sites owned by MindGeek including YouPorn and RedTube.   

The ex-staffers claimed that PornHub's guidelines were the most lenient and their job was 'to find weird excuses not to remove' videos.

They spoke of managers who felt 'untouchable' boasting of soaring profits at all-staff meetings and who took too long to report and remove concerning content.   

Mandatory 400 videos a day quotas were introduced in the spring, leading to 'panic attacks' among some staff who were under 'surveillance' and felt unable to watch so much questionable content.

Moderators who didn't meet the quota could be terminated whilst others say they suffered from 'burn out' from watching 'a life time' of pornography and upsetting content, with some reporting low sex drive, as a result, and others, higher.    

'As the leaders in the porn industry, in adult entertainment, I thought it was their moral obligation to do a lot more', one whistleblower said.   

The revelations are the latest in a series of blows to the controversial adult entertainment company in the last few weeks.  

On December 15 MindGeek was sued for $80 million by 40 women who say the site profited from 'sex trafficking' operation GirlsDoPorn.

In a complaint filed in California, the alleged victims say MindGeek 'knew it was partnering with and profiting from a sex trafficking venture for years'.

On December 14 the site was forced to remove 10 million videos, the majority of its content, from unverified users, following a New York Times report which said it was profiting from videos of child sexual exploitation, rape and revenge porn.

Even after the videos were flagged and removed, downloaded copies continued to circulate, often with severe personal consequences, the paper said.

PornHub now says it only allows content from verified users, something other social media giants like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat and Twitter have yet to implement. 

Credit card companies Visa, Mastercard and Discover severed ties with the company soon afterwards, blocking customers from making purchases on Pornhub.

Users can still pay in cryptocurrency.  

In January a judge found that the owners and operators of GirlsDoPorn must pay $12.7 million for lying to women about how their explicit videos would be distributed.  

PornHub said that it doesn't knowingly allow images of sexual abuse of children.

In the latest revelations, whistleblower 'Brian', a pseudonym as he signed a non-disclosure agreement, said that when he worked at MindGeek's Montreal offices a few years ago they were required to review a minimum of 1,200 videos a day, a number that the company has disputed.

Brian also revealed the strange, internal logic that his team used to allow suspicious content through. 

If an incest video title said 'his mother', it was taken down, he said, but if it said 'mother f---s son', then they could argue she was a generic mother, of no relation to the son, and the video was approved. 

'Our job was to find weird excuses to keep videos on our sites,' said Brian.  

He added: 'At one point we were debating what creatures were OK to be stepped on. Crickets, insects, and crawfish were OK, but not goldfish, because people have goldfish as pets.'

Later, when his team reviewed videos of women kicking puppies to death, MindGeek decided the rules were too lenient, and they prohibited stepping on any living creature.

MindGeek eventually made some of the changes Brian's team recommended but he said some recent changes, like reporting suspicious videos to local authorities and adding more mental-health services, were too slow to arrive.  

Brian quit several years ago after suffering burnout from all the videos.  

'We joked that in a month we'd see more porn than someone would see in a lifetime,' he said.

'I talked about that with people I was working with — how doing this work affected them in their personal lives. Some people had a lack of sex drive, some people said it didn't affect them, and some people said it increased their sex drive.'  

In March, when video shoots halted due to COVID-19, some non-moderator teams were moved over to review content, another former employee, 'John', claimed. 

The new members allegedly underwent two training sessions before being handed an Excel document with tens of thousands of suspicious videos to check, with a mandatory quota of 400 a day.  

John said: 'It was the first time ever that anyone was under this much type of surveillance, at least on my team, because we didn't have to log hours. I had a coworker who was having panic attacks every week.'

He added that increased scrutiny on the company later caused their guidelines to get stricter with some videos being flagged that wouldn't have been before, including performers simulating scenes of sex involving a person who was asleep, some BDSM content, and videos with visible bottles of alcohol.  

John added that the lack of industry consensus on 'best practices', including Facebook and other social media sites, was no excuse and reported hearing the CEO bragging at the annual February all-staff meeting about how much money MindGeek was making.

'You know it's an issue. You always have to deal with it,' John said. 'The fact that they didn't shows you how untouchable they felt.'

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk