「腦認知與睡眠」公眾號，主要關注大腦的學習認知，與睡眠相關的科研資訊與科普，同時搭建一個「腦認知與睡眠」研究方向的科研人員交流平臺~~感興趣的可以長按/掃下面的二維碼關注。
微信公眾號二維碼
從2001年至2011年，《Environmental Microbiology》每年都會發布一份審稿意見集錦，其中2010年這篇文章在網上廣為流傳，因為審稿人的意見集毒舌與搞笑於一體，狠不狠我不知道，反正挺犀利的，來看看吧：The results are as weak as wet noodles.（結論跟溼麵條一樣軟弱無力）The authors are amateur.（作者怕不是個兼職的）It is a bit for me that authors have used Python statistical analysis instead of SPSS or Matlab as usual.Please,explain.（本文用了Python而不是像通常用SPSS和Matlab處理數據，為啥）Did you have seizure while writing this sentence?Because I fell like I had one while reading it.（你寫文章的時候犯癲癇了嗎？反正我覺得我讀的時候犯了）Why chase a gene in this ridiculous organism?（為什麼在這種荒誕的生物裡追求一個基因）This paper introduce tools to answer questions which it dose not seem many people are interested in.（本文介紹了一些工具，但人們並不感興趣）The English language ranks this manuscript among the top 5 worst manuscripts I have ever reviewed.（這篇文章的英語水平可以排進我看過的最爛的前五）I started reading this manuscript with much anticipation.But my enthusiasm was short lived.（我滿懷期待讀這篇文章，但熱情很短）I have rarely a more blown-up and annoy paper in the last couple of years than this hot-air balloon manuscript.（我過去幾年都沒讀過像這篇熱氣球一樣煩人的文章）Figure3.This figure is silly.（這圖好蠢吶）This paper makes no contribution.（這文章沒啥貢獻）But now, there are over 1000 articles on this topic. But this author have not read a single.（這個方向至少有一千篇文章，作者沒讀過一篇）Reject-More holes than my grandads' string vest.（拒了，漏洞比我爺爺的背心上的網眼還多）The biggest problem with manuscript, which has nearly sucked thevp will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.（這篇稿子審得我都想自掛東南枝了）This paper is desperate. Please reject it complete and then block The author's email ID so they can't use The online system future.（文章太差了，麻煩封掉作者的帳號以免他以後再投稿）The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.（手稿和數據顯示讓我整個人都不好了，不得不提前下班，開始懷疑人生）The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.(就算回到本科時期，我也會拒掉這種文章)It's hard for me to understand why it takes 5 authors to perform and describe one simple experiment.（我很難理解為啥需要5個作者來闡述這麼簡單的一個問題）This was a possible candidate for me the 'worst use of statistics to substantiate and falsehood' award.（這篇文章可以競選一下瞎雞兒統計學得出錯誤結論獎）If I had known this would be sucj an easy one to review(reject!), I would have done it earlier instead of waiting for my dog to have a baby.（拒了，早曉得審稿如此簡單，我就該早做了而不是等我狗生完）The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.（作者的寫作水平和數據展示讓我整個人都不好了，我不得不提前下班、早點回家，甚至有點懷疑人生。）The biggest problem with this manuscript， which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me， is the terrible writing style.（這篇稿件的寫作風格簡直太差了，審得我都不想活了！）（啊這，讀別人的論文要錢，讀你的論文要命啊.）https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1600446865本文來源知乎，僅用於學術分享。若有侵權，請聯繫我們刪除或修改！
如何選擇SCI期刊，也是一門技巧。「51選刊」應此而建，目的主要是幫助大家選擇擬投稿的SCI期刊！「51選刊」目前已經開通了：SCI期刊自引率、版面費、是否屬於OA期刊、年發文量、投稿難度、投稿網址等功能！歡迎大家關注！
掃描二維碼即可關注「51選刊」 (ID: woyaoxuankan)！