2020年10月29日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要

2021-03-05 NEJM醫學前沿

奧希替尼治療切除術後的EGFR突變型非小細胞肺癌

Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

背景

奧希替尼是既往未經治療的表皮生長因子受體(EGFR)突變陽性晚期非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)的標準治療。奧希替尼作為輔助治療的療效和安全性尚未明確。Osimertinib is standard-of-care therapy for previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation–positive advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and safety of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy are unknown.

方法

在此項雙盲、3期試驗中,我們以1:1的比例將完全切除術後的EGFR突變陽性NSCLC患者隨機分組,兩組分別接受為期3年的奧希替尼(每日80 mg)或安慰劑治療。主要終點是II至IIIA期肺癌(根據研究者的判定結果)患者的無病生存期。次要終點包括整個IB至IIIA期肺癌患者人群的無病生存期,以及總生存期和安全性。In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with completely resected EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 years. The primary end point was disease-free survival among patients with stage II to IIIA disease (according to investigator assessment). The secondary end points included disease-free survival in the overall population of patients with stage IB to IIIA disease, overall survival, and safety.

結果

共計682例患者接受了隨機分組(奧希替尼組339例,安慰劑組343例)。第24個月時,奧希替尼組90%(95%置信區間[CI],84~93)和安慰劑組44%(95% CI,37~51)的II至IIIA期肺癌患者無病生存(疾病復發或死亡的總風險比,0.17;99.06% CI,0.11~0.26;P<0.001)。在整個人群中,奧希替尼組89%(95% CI,85~92)和安慰劑組52%(95% CI,46~58)的患者在24個月時無病生存(疾病復發或死亡的總風險比,0.20;99.12% CI,0.14~0.30;P<0.001)。第24個月時,奧希替尼組98%(95% CI,95~99)和安慰劑組85%(95% CI,80~89)的患者生存且無中樞神經系統轉移(疾病復發或死亡的總風險比,0.18;95% CI,0.10~0.33)。總生存期數據尚不成熟;29例患者死亡(奧希替尼組9例,安慰劑組20例)。未發現新的安全性問題。

Result

A total of 682 patients underwent randomization (339 to the osimertinib group and 343 to the placebo group). At 24 months, 90% of the patients with stage II to IIIA disease in the osimertinib group (95% confidence interval [CI], 84 to 93) and 44% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 37 to 51) were alive and disease-free (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.17; 99.06% CI, 0.11 to 0.26; P<0.001). In the overall population, 89% of the patients in the osimertinib group (95% CI, 85 to 92) and 52% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 46 to 58) were alive and disease-free at 24 months (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.20; 99.12% CI, 0.14 to 0.30; P<0.001). At 24 months, 98% of the patients in the osimertinib group (95% CI, 95 to 99) and 85% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 80 to 89) were alive and did not have central nervous system disease (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.33). Overall survival data were immature; 29 patients died (9 in the osimertinib group and 20 in the placebo group). No new safety concerns were noted.

結論

在IB至IIIA期EGFR突變陽性NSCLC患者中,奧希替尼組患者的無病生存期顯著超過安慰劑組患者。(由阿斯利康資助;ADAURA在ClinicalTrials.gov註冊號為NCT02511106。)

Conclusions

In patients with stage IB to IIIA EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC, disease-free survival was significantly longer among those who received osimertinib than among those who received placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02511106.)

Yi-Long Wu, Masahiro Tsuboi, Jie He, et al. Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2027071

本周五 中午十二點 app和官網發布全文中譯

冰島人群對SARS-CoV-2的體液免疫應答

Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland

背景

關於人體感染SARS-CoV-2後體液免疫應答的特點和持久性,目前仍知之甚少。

Little is known about the nature and durability of the humoral immune response to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

方法

我們應用六種檢測法(包括兩種全類別免疫球蛋白[pan-Ig]檢測法)測定了冰島30,576人血清樣本內的抗體;血清反應陽性的判定指標是兩種pan-Ig檢測法的結果均呈陽性。我們檢測了在定量聚合酶鏈反應(qPCR)確診感染後4個月內採集的1237人的2102份樣本,以及曾暴露於SARS-CoV-2的4222名被隔離人員和23,452名未發生已知暴露人員的抗體。

We measured antibodies in serum samples from 30,576 persons in Iceland, using six assays (including two pan-immunoglobulin [pan-Ig] assays), and we determined that the appropriate measure of seropositivity was a positive result with both pan-Ig assays. We tested 2102 samples collected from 1237 persons up to 4 months after diagnosis by a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay. We measured antibodies in 4222 quarantined persons who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and in 23,452 persons not known to have been exposed.

結果

在SARS-CoV-2感染後已康復的1797人中,1215名被檢測者中有1107名(91.1%)呈血清反應陽性;兩種pan-Ig檢測法測出的抗病毒抗體滴度在qPCR確診感染後的2個月期間升高,並在之後的研究期間維持穩定。在被隔離人員中,2.3%呈血清反應陽性;在未發生已知暴露的人員中,0.3%呈陽性。我們估計有0.9%的冰島人曾感染SARS-CoV-2,其中0.3%導致了死亡。我們還估計在冰島的所有SARS-CoV-2感染者中,有56%曾通過qPCR確診,有14%發生於未接受qPCR檢測的被隔離人員(或者qPCR檢測後結果並非陽性者),30%發生於未被隔離且未接受qPCR檢測的人員。

Result

Of the 1797 persons who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1107 of the 1215 who were tested (91.1%) were seropositive; antiviral antibody titers assayed by two pan-Ig assays increased during 2 months after diagnosis by qPCR and remained on a plateau for the remainder of the study. Of quarantined persons, 2.3% were seropositive; of those with unknown exposure, 0.3% were positive. We estimate that 0.9% of Icelanders were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and that the infection was fatal in 0.3%. We also estimate that 56% of all SARS-CoV-2 infections in Iceland had been diagnosed with qPCR, 14% had occurred in quarantined persons who had not been tested with qPCR (or who had not received a positive result, if tested), and 30% had occurred in persons outside quarantine and not tested with qPCR.

結論

我們的研究結果表明,針對SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒抗體在確診感染後4個月內並未下降。我們估計因感染SARS-CoV-2而死亡的風險為0.3%,冰島感染者中有44%未經過qPCR確診。

Conclusions

Our results indicate that antiviral antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 did not decline within 4 months after diagnosis. We estimate that the risk of death from infection was 0.3% and that 44% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland were not diagnosed by qPCR.

Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Gudmundur L. Norddahl, Pall Melsted, et al. Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026116

本周五 中午十二點 app和官網發布全文中譯

小劑量艾多沙班治療高齡患者心房顫動

Low-Dose Edoxaban in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

背景

通過適當口服抗凝來預防高齡心房顫動患者的卒中有難度,原因是擔心患者發生出血。

Implementation of appropriate oral anticoagulant treatment for the prevention of stroke in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is challenging because of concerns regarding bleeding.

方法

我們開展了一項3期、多中心、隨機、雙盲、安慰劑對照的事件驅動試驗,試驗納入了不適合採用已批准的卒中預防劑量進行口服抗凝治療的日本高齡(年齡≥80歲)非瓣膜性心房顫動患者,目的是比較每日一次15 mg艾多沙班與安慰劑的效果。主要療效終點是由卒中或體循環栓塞構成的複合終點,主要安全性終點是國際血栓與止血學會(International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis)定義的大出血。

We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial to compare a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban with placebo in elderly Japanese patients (≥80 years of age) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not considered to be appropriate candidates for oral anticoagulant therapy at doses approved for stroke prevention. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding according to the definition of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

結果

共計984例患者被隨機分配(1:1比例)接受15 mg日劑量的艾多沙班(492例患者)或安慰劑(492例患者)。681例患者完成試驗,303例患者停止試驗(158例退出,135例死亡,10例其他原因);兩組中停止試驗的患者數量相似。艾多沙班組和安慰劑組患者卒中或體循環栓塞的年發生率分別為2.3%和6.7%(風險比,0.34;95%置信區間[CI],0.19~0.61;P<0.001),艾多沙班組和安慰劑組患者大出血的年發生率分別為3.3%和1.8%(風險比,1.87;95% CI,0.90~3.89;P=0.09)。艾多沙班組的消化道出血事件發生率明顯高於安慰劑組。兩組的全因死亡率無明顯差異(艾多沙班組9.9%,安慰劑組10.2%;風險比,0.97;95% CI,0.69~1.36)。

Result

A total of 984 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a daily dose of 15 mg of edoxaban (492 patients) or placebo (492 patients). A total of 681 patients completed the trial, and 303 discontinued (158 withdrew, 135 died, and 10 had other reasons); the numbers of patients who discontinued the trial were similar in the two groups. The annualized rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 2.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.61; P<0.001), and the annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 1.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.89; P=0.09). There were substantially more events of gastrointestinal bleeding in the edoxaban group than in the placebo group. There was no substantial between-group difference in death from any cause (9.9% in the edoxaban group and 10.2% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.36).

結論

在不適合接受常規劑量口服抗凝劑的日本高齡非瓣膜性心房顫動患者中,在預防卒中或體循環栓塞方面,每日一次15 mg的艾多沙班優於安慰劑,且艾多沙班組的大出血發生率並未顯著高於安慰劑組。(由第一三共株式會社資助;在ClinicalTrials.gov註冊號為NCT02801669。)

Conclusions

In very elderly Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not appropriate candidates for standard doses of oral anticoagulants, a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban was superior to placebo in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and did not result in a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding than placebo. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ELDERCARE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02801669.)Ken Okumura, Masaharu Akao, Tetsuro Yoshida, et al. Low-Dose Edoxaban in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2012883

外顯子組測序在非免疫性胎兒水腫產前診斷中的應用

Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis in Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis

背景

胎兒畸形的原因大多無法在產前確定。外顯子組測序已改變了嬰兒出生後的遺傳學診斷,但其在產前診斷中的作用才逐漸顯現。非免疫性胎兒水腫(NIHF)是一種通常致命的胎兒異常,有許多遺傳原因;外顯子組測序對其診斷有多大幫助尚不明確。

The cause of most fetal anomalies is not determined prenatally. Exome sequencing has transformed genetic diagnosis after birth, but its usefulness for prenatal diagnosis is still emerging. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), a fetal abnormality that is often lethal, has numerous genetic causes; the extent to which exome sequencing can aid in its diagnosis is unclear.

方法

我們評估了連續127例不明原因的NIHF病例,NIHF的定義為有胎兒腹水、胸腔或心包積液、皮膚水腫、囊狀水瘤、胎兒頸後透明層厚度增加或上述多種情況。主要結局是外顯子組測序對遺傳變異的診斷率,遺傳變異根據美國醫學遺傳學和基因組學會(American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics)標準分成致病性和可能致病性兩類。次要結局是特定遺傳病相關病例的百分比和遺傳的變異的比例。

We evaluated a series of 127 consecutive unexplained cases of NIHF that were defined by the presence of fetal ascites, pleural or pericardial effusions, skin edema, cystic hygroma, increased nuchal translucency, or a combination of these conditions. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for detecting genetic variants that were classified as either pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of cases associated with specific genetic disorders and the proportion of variants that were inherited.

結果

在127個病例中,我們識別出37例(29%)存在具有診斷意義的遺傳變異,包括影響RAS-MAPK細胞信號通路的疾病(稱作RAS病)(佔遺傳診斷的30%),先天性代謝病和肌肉骨骼疾病(各佔11%)的遺傳變異,以及淋巴、神經發育、心血管和血液疾病(各佔8%)等。其預後從相對較輕的結局至圍產期死亡不等。在存在具有診斷意義的遺傳變異的病例中,68%(25/37)為常染色體顯性(其中12%來自遺傳,88%為新發),27%(10/37)為常染色體隱性(其中95%來自遺傳,5%為新發),1例為遺傳的X染色體連鎖隱性,1例的遺傳情況不確定。我們識別出另外12例存在可能具有診斷意義的變異。

Result

In 37 of the 127 cases (29%), we identified diagnostic genetic variants, including those for disorders affecting the RAS–MAPK cell-signaling pathway (known as RASopathies) (30% of the genetic diagnoses); inborn errors of metabolism and musculoskeletal disorders (11% each); lymphatic, neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, and hematologic disorders (8% each); and others. Prognoses ranged from a relatively mild outcome to death during the perinatal period. Overall, 68% of the cases (25 of 37) with diagnostic variants were autosomal dominant (of which 12% were inherited and 88% were de novo), 27% (10 of 37) were autosomal recessive (of which 95% were inherited and 5% were de novo), 1 was inherited X-linked recessive, and 1 was of uncertain inheritance. We identified potentially diagnostic variants in an additional 12 cases.

結論

在這項包含127名不明原因NIHF胎兒的病例系列研究中,我們在約三分之一病例識別出具有診斷意義的遺傳變異。(由UCSF母胎精準醫學中心[UCSF Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine]等資助;在ClinicalTrials.gov註冊號為NCT03412760。)

Conclusions

In this large case series of 127 fetuses with unexplained NIHF, we identified a diagnostic genetic variant in approximately one third of the cases. (Funded by the UCSF Center for Maternal–Fetal Precision Medicine and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03412760.)
Teresa N. Sparks, Billie R. Lianoglou, Rebecca R. Adami, et al. Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis in Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2023643

關注《NEJM醫學前沿》

本文由《NEJM醫學前沿》編輯部負責翻譯、編寫或約稿。對於源自NEJM集團旗下英文產品的翻譯和編寫文章,內容請以英文原版為準。中譯全文以及所含圖表等,由麻薩諸塞州醫學會NEJM集團獨家授權。如需轉載,請聯繫nejmqianyan@nejmqianyan.cn。未經授權的翻譯是侵權行為,版權方保留追究法律責任的權利。

點擊「閱讀原文」 第一時間獲得NEJM最新論著摘要

相關焦點

  • 2020年12月10日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    與安慰劑組相比,託珠單抗組插管或死亡的風險比為0.83(95%置信區間[CI],0.38~1.81;P=0.64),病情惡化的風險比為1.11(95% CI,0.59~2.10;P=0.73)。14日時,託珠單抗組18.0%患者和安慰劑組14.9%患者的病情惡化。
  • 2020年12月31日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    在接種第一劑後發生的10例重症COVID-19中,9例發生於安慰劑組,1例發生於BNT162b2組。BNT162b2的安全性特徵包括短期的輕度至中度注射部位疼痛、疲勞和頭痛。疫苗組和安慰劑組的嚴重不良事件發生率均較低且相似。
  • 2020年12月24日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    方法我們在妊娠26周0日至33周6日,並且有早產風險的孕婦中開展了一項多國、隨機試驗。參與者被分配接受地塞米松或安慰劑肌內注射。結果來自孟加拉國、印度、肯亞、奈及利亞和巴基斯坦29家二級和三級醫院的共計2852名女性(及其3070名胎兒)接受了隨機分組。在第二次期中分析時,本試驗因藥物有益而提前終止。
  • 2020年7月23日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    方法從2020年3月15日至5月20日,我們在美國各地的兒科醫療中心對MIS-C進行了針對性的監測。患者的中位年齡為8.3歲,男性115例(62%),既往體健的患者為135例(73%),通過RT-PCR或抗體檢測證實SARS-CoV-2陽性者為131例(70%),2020年4月16日後住院者為164例(88%)。受累的器官系統包括消化系統(171例[92%]),心血管系統(149例[80%]),血液系統(142例[76%]),皮膚黏膜(137例[74%])和呼吸系統(131例[70%])。
  • 2020年10月15日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    結果分別有2007和2040例患者被納入手術組和對照組,1135例參與者被納入參考隊列。在分析時(2018年12月31日),手術組和對照組患者死亡率的中位隨訪時間分別為24年(四分位距,22~27)和22年(四分位距,21~27);本研究獲得了99.9%患者的死亡數據。
  • 2020年12月17日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    本試驗通過鼻拭子樣本定量聚合酶鏈反應(qPCR)檢測了研究志願者的SARS-CoV-2感染情況,樣本採集時間是志願者到達集中隔離地點與第2日之間,以及第7日和第14日。未自願參與本研究的新兵僅在第14日(隔離期結束時)接受了qPCR檢測。我們對來自受感染志願者的病毒基因組進行了系統發育分析,從而識別傳播簇,並評估感染的流行病學特徵。
  • 2020年9月24日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    在阿維魯單抗組和對照組中,1年總生存率分別為71.3%和58.4%(中位總生存期,21.4個月vs. 14.3個月;死亡的風險比,0.69;95%置信區間[CI],0.56~0.86;P=0.001)。阿維魯單抗還顯著延長了PD-L1陽性人群的總生存期;在阿維魯單抗組和對照組中,1年總生存率分別為79.1%和60.4%(風險比,0.56;95% CI,0.40~0.79;P<0.001)。
  • 2020年7月9日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    在接受tofersen治療的參與者中,分別有4例和5例報告了不良事件CSF白細胞計數增加和蛋白升高。在接受tofersen治療的參與者中,1例於第137日死於肺栓塞,1例於第152日死於呼吸衰竭;安慰劑組1例參與者於第52日死於呼吸衰竭。
  • 2021年2月11日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    結論在兩項設計相同的試驗中,在2個月時,tirbanibulin 1%軟膏(每日1次,連續用藥5日)對光線性角化病的治療效果優於溶媒,但與一過性的局部反應和1年時的皮損復發相關。我們需要開展比較tirbanibulin和常規治療以及隨訪時間較長的試驗,從而確定tirbanibulin對光線性角化病的療效。
  • 2021年1月14日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》英文音頻和中文摘要
    sotagliflozin組和安慰劑組的心血管原因死亡率分別為10.6例/100患者-年和12.5例/100患者-年(風險比,0.84;95% CI,0.58~1.22);sotagliflozin組和安慰劑組的全因死亡率分別為13.5例/100患者-年和16.3例/100患者-年(風險比,0.82;95% CI,0.59~1.14)。
  • 世界頂級醫學雜誌《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》中文電子周刊《NEJM醫學...
    2016年11月15日,由北京大學分子醫學研究所所長肖瑞平教授擔任副主編的《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》中文電子周刊《NEJM醫學前沿》正式發布,肖瑞平擔任該平臺執行主編。《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》及新英格蘭醫學雜誌集團總編輯傑弗裡·德拉岑博士在上海科學會堂宣布了這一消息,並稱這一周刊「將通過交流可靠的醫學信息來解決中國亟待滿足的慢病防治需求」。
  • 世界頂級醫學雜誌《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》推出中文電子周刊
    ►《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》中文電子平臺《NEJM醫學前沿》網站截圖www.nejmqianyan.cn
  • ...疫情中頻頻出現的《柳葉刀》和《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》是什麼期刊?
    中央紀委國家監委網站 徐夢龍2月29日,由鍾南山院士領銜的「中國2019新型冠狀病毒疾病的臨床特徵」研究論文在《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》(The New England Journal of Medicine)上在線公開發表。
  • 2021年2月4日 |《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》中文摘要
    安慰劑組185例參與者(每1000人-年56.5例;95%置信區間[CI],48.7~65.3)和mRNA-1273組11例參與者(每1000人-年3.3例;95% CI,1.7~6.0)被確診為症狀的COVID-19;疫苗有效率為94.1%(95% CI,89.3%~96.8%;P<0.001)。
  • ...疫情中頻頻發文的《柳葉刀》和《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》,是什麼期刊
    《柳葉刀》和《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》等世界級著名醫學雜誌單獨為武漢疫情開設了專欄並免費向公眾開放,中國學者同仁的名字也頻頻曝光。《柳葉刀》和《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》是什麼期刊?又有怎樣的重要性和權威性?聽到柳葉刀這個名字,你最先想到的是什麼?外科手術用的手術器械,因其彎、小、薄,狀如柳葉,故稱之為柳葉刀。
  • 《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》總編:高福等人論文「有急迫公共衛生需要」
    1月29日,題為《新型冠狀病毒感染的肺炎在中國武漢的初期傳播動力學》的論文在權威醫學期刊《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》(NEJM)官網上發表。論文通過數據分析得出結論:「自2019年12月中旬以來,密切接觸者之間發生了人傳人。」這引發了外界的質疑,因為人傳人的結論在中國被真正公開,是1月20日由國家衛健委高級別專家組組長鍾南山院士對外發布的。
  • 《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》批評美國政府抗疫不力
    《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》批評美國政府抗疫不力 人民日報華盛頓10月9日消息,國際權威醫學期刊《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》8日發表社論,批評美國政府應對新冠肺炎疫情不力,幾乎每一步都出現失敗,給美國社會造成了巨大損失。
  • 中國疾病預防控制中心關於在新英格蘭醫學雜誌發表文章的說明
    【中國疾病預防控制中心關於在新英格蘭醫學雜誌發表文章的說明】2020年1月29日,中國疾病預防控制中心、湖北省疾病預防控制中心等單位有關專業人員共同在新英格蘭雜誌發表了題為《新型冠狀病毒感染的肺炎在中國武漢的初期傳播動力學》的論文,有網友提出質疑。
  • 「精準醫學」尚需精準理解 | 對《自然》《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》兩篇...
    然而,最近國際知名學術期刊《自然》和《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》相繼發表文章對此表示質疑,並引發科學家激烈討論,讓人們不得不重新思考和認識「精準醫學」 。精準醫學並不能惠及大部分患者?「精準醫學只讓極少人從中獲益,大多數腫瘤患者可能不會獲益。」
  • 【《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》批評美國政府抗疫不力】國際權威醫學期刊...
    文 / 夏洛特2020-10-10 05:51:06來源:FX168 【《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》批評美國政府抗疫不力】國際權威醫學期刊《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》8日發表社論,批評美國政府應對新冠肺炎疫情不力,幾乎每一步都出現失敗,給美國社會造成了巨大損失