The next break out, we are not ready

2021-02-20 雲南省成考函授報名諮詢

比爾.蓋茨2015年在TED的演講

(初學字幕,中英文字幕哦)

When I was a kid, the disaster we worried about most was a nuclear war. That's why we had a barrel like this down in our basement, filled with cans of food and water. When the nuclear attacking, we were supposed to go downstairs, hunker down, and eat out of that barrel.

 

Today the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn't look like this. Instead, it looks like this. If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes. Now, part of the reason for this is that we've invested a huge amount in nuclear deterrents. But we've actually invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic. We're not ready for the next epidemic.

Let's look at Ebola. I'm sure all of you read about it in the newspaper, lots of tough challenges. I followed it carefully through the case analysis tools we use to track polio eradication. And as you look at what went on, the problem wasn't that there was a system that didn't work well enough, the problem was that we didn't have a system at all. In fact, there's some pretty obvious key missing pieces.

We didn't have a group of epide biologists ready to go, who would have gone, seen what the disease was, seen how far it had spread. The case reports came in on paper. It was very delayed before they were put online and they were extremely inaccurate. We didn't have a medical team ready to go. We didn't have a way of preparing people. Now, Médecins Sans Frontières did a great job orchestrating volunteers. But even so, we were fars lower than we should have been getting the thousands of workers into these countries. And a large epidemic would require us to have hundreds of thousands of workers. There was no one there to look at treatment approaches. No one to look at the diagnostics. No one to figure out what tools should be used. As an example, we could have taken the blood of survivors, processed it, and put that plasma back in people to protect them. But that was never tried.

So there was a lot that was missing. And these things are really a global failure. The WHO is funded to monitor epidemics, but not to do these things I talked about. Now, in the movies it's quite different. There's a group of handsome epidemiologists ready to go. they move in, they save the day, but that's just pure Hollywood.

The failure to prepare could allow the next epidemic to be dramatically more devastating than Ebola. Let's look at the progression of Ebola over this year. About 10,000 people died,  and nearly all were in the three West African countries. There's three reasons why it didn't spread more. The first is that there was a lot of heroic work by the health workers. They found the people and they prevented more infections. The second is the nature of the virus. Eboladoes not spread through the air. And by the time you're contagious, most people are so sick that they're bedridden. Third, it didn't get into many urban areas. And that was just luck. If it had gotten into a lot more urban areas, the case numbers would have been much larger.

So next time, we might not be so lucky. You can have a virus where people feel well enough while they're infectious that they get on a plane or they go to a market. The source of the virus could be a natural epidemic like Ebola, or it could be bioterrorism. So there are things that would literally make things a thousand times worse.

 

In fact, let's look at a model of a virus spread through the air, like the Spanish Flu back in 1918. So here's what would happen: It would spread throughout the world very, very quickly. And you can see over 30 million people died from that epidemic. So this is a serious problem. We should be concerned.

But in fact, we can build a really good response system. We have the benefits of all the science and technology that we talk about here. We've got cell phones to get information from the public and get information out to them. We have satellite maps where we can see where people are and where they're moving. We have advances in biology that should dramatically change the turn around time to look at a pathogen and be able to make drugs and vaccines that fit for that pathogen. So we can have tools, but those tools need to be put into an overall global health system. And we need preparedness.

The best lessons, I think, on how to get prepared are again, what we do for war. For soldiers, we have full-time,waiting to go. We have reserves that can scale us up to large numbers. NATO has a mobile unit that can deploy very rapidly. NATO does a lot of war games to check, are people well trained? Do they understand about fuel and logistics and the same radio frequencies? So they are absolutely ready to go. So those are the kinds of things we need to deal with an epidemic.

What are the key pieces? First, we need strong health systems in poor countries. That's where mothers can give birth safely, kids can get all their vaccines. But, also where we'll see the outbreak very early on. We need a medical reserve corps: lots of people who've got the training and background who are ready to go, with the expertise. And then we need to pair those medical people with the military taking advantage of the military's ability to move fast, do logistics and secure areas. We need to do simulations, germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. The last time a germ game was done in the United States was back in 2001, and it didn't go so well. So far the score is germs: 1, people: 0. Finally, we need lots of advanced R&D in areas of vaccines and diagnostics. There are some big breakthroughs, like the Adeno-associated virus, that could work very, very quickly.

 

Now I don't have an exact budget for what this would cost, but I'm quite sure it's very modest compared to the potential harm. The World Bank estimates that if we have a worldwide flu epidemic, global wealth will go down by over three trillion dollars and we'd have millions and millions of deaths. These investments offer significant benefits beyond just being ready for the epidemic. The primary healthcare, the R&D, those things would reduce global health equity and make the world more just as well as more safe.

So I think this should absolutely be apriority. There's no need to panic. We don't have to hoard cans of spaghetti or go down into the basement. But we need to get going, because time is not on our side.

In fact, if there's one positive thing that can come out of the Ebola epidemic, it's that it can serve as an early warning, a wake-up call, to get ready. If we start now, we can be ready for the next epidemic.

學歷處處可用,不需之時,覺得可有可無;

急需之時,無處可拿。

學歷,寧可十年不用,不可一日不備;

未來學歷愈發重要,請未雨綢繆!

2021年學歷提升(成人高考)報名已開始,

歡迎諮詢!

不滿足於眼前,學習不停,提升不止

成為優秀不再難!

記住!學習什麼時候開始都不晚!

想報名的小夥伴們,一定要抓緊時間行動起來~

✔  我們只做正規學歷提升

✔  學歷證書學信網終身可查,文憑終身有效

✔  電子註冊,企事業單位認可度高

✔  升職加薪,職稱評定皆可

心動不如行動

掃描二維碼添加老師微信,會通知您

最新報名、準考證列印、考試、成績查詢時間

歡迎關注「雲南省成考函授報名諮詢」

長按二維碼識別關注

相關焦點

  • R語言中的next語句和break語句的具體用法
    我們知道在像C語言,C#語言,Java語言中可以分別使用continue語句和break語句來實現,那麼在R語言中也是這樣的嗎?回答是不完全是這樣的。在R語言中要終止某一次循環要使用next來實現,要終止整個循環就可以使用break語句來實現。
  • to,over,out短語,必記必備!
    短語(be) stressed out有壓力的;緊張的blow out吹滅break out(戰爭、火災等)突然發生,爆發bring out使顯現;使表現出check out查明;結帳離開clear out清理;丟掉clean
  • 實用英語丨關於break的動詞短語大全,內含多種用法~
    However, to break out on your skin means to have a rash. To break out of your shell can mean to be liberated.
  • 「break camp」是「破壞營地」嗎?不!它是「拔營」的意思!
    bow out 這個習語不是「鞠躬、點頭」的意思,它的意思是「退出」,就是停止從事某件事情。舉例:He had bowed out gracefully when his successor had been appointed. 當他的繼任者被任命時,他很有風度地退出了。
  • Pulling their hair out 焦慮
    If something happens and they start pulling their hair, pulling at their hair or, worst, pulling their hair out, we understand they’re showing signs of exasperation.
  • Why Don't We Let Go?
    However, they still have to choose what to do next and that is their own responsibility. You need to dive deeper and figure out why and how you are responsible for it. Taking responsibility puts us in a powerful position where we have control.
  • 「分手」是break up,那「拆散他們」用英語怎麼說?其實你知道!
    「分手」是break up,那「拆散他們」用英語怎麼說?其實你知道!01「拆散」英語咋說?因為break up除了表示「分手」以外,也可以表示「拆散」。具體怎麼區分呢,看幾個英文例句就知道了:① I broke up with my boyfriend yesterday because he cheated on me.
  • break及其構成短語的用法匯總
    5)break out①逃脫,逃出to break out of prison越獄逃跑②突然發生The fire broke out in the basement.地下室著了火。A broke out B put out C. came out D. got out答案1 A large piece of ice broke away from the main block
  • We have never abandoned you: A family's search for the daughter
    He stood there until dark, returning the next morning.He swore to find his daughter: 「Even if she doesn’t want to acknowledge us, as long as we know she is healthy and happy, we』ll live in peace.」
  • Prison Break 1《越獄》1(精講之一)(組圖)
    Sid: Youre telling me youre just gonna walk out of here andImnever going to see it again.  Michael: Theres a good chance of that, yes.
  • near, nearby, next和close用法區別,都可以表示「近的」
    今天我們來學習near, nearby, next和close的用法。The bus drew near and we got on together.公共汽車駛近了,我們一起上了車。He must be getting near retiring age.他一定快到退休年齡了。
  • 英語詞彙:關於out的習語和表達
    下面是關於詞語out的英語習語和表達。每個習語或表達後面都有定義解釋,以及兩個例子來幫助你理解這些關於out的常見習語表達。   You don't need to blow your report card out of proportion. You'll do better next time.   你不需要對自己的成績單誇大其詞。下次你會做得更好的。   The boss is blowing the drop in sales out of proportion.
  • tongue指「舌頭」,那ready tongue是指什麼呢?還有ready worker
    今天我們要學習的關鍵詞就是「ready 」,下面我們一起來看看吧!readyready的比較級:readier;最高級:readiest;第三人稱單數:readies;現在分詞:readying;過去式:readied;過去分詞:readied。