經濟學人最新期封面有聲閱讀《前方不遠處,疫苗可期:Suddenly,Hope》(文末下載,訂一年送一年活動進行中~)

2021-02-21 原版雜誌E書格子鋪
NINE LONG years elapsed between the isolation of the measles virus in 1954 and the licensing of a vaccine. The world waited for 20 years between early trials of a polio vaccine and the first American licence in 1955. Marvel, then, at how the world’s scientists are on course to produce a working vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes covid-19, within a single year.

And not just any vaccine. The early data from a final-stage trial unveiled this week by Pfizer and BioNTech, two pharma companies, suggests that vaccination cuts your chances of suffering symptoms by more than 90%. That is almost as good as for measles and better than the flu jab, with an efficacy of just 40-60% (see article). Suddenly, in a dark winter, there is hope.

Not surprisingly, Pfizer’s news on November 9th roused the markets』 bulls. Investors dumped shares in Clorox, Peloton and tech firms, which have all benefited from the coronavirus, and instead switched into firms like Disney, Carnival and International Consolidated Airlines Group, which will do well when the sun shines again (see article). The OECD, a club of mainly rich countries, reckons that global growth in 2021 with an early vaccine will be 7%, two percentage points higher than without.

There is indeed much to celebrate. Pfizer’s result suggests that other vaccines will work, too. Over 320 are in development, several in advanced trials. Most, like Pfizer’s, focus on the spike protein with which SARS-CoV-2 gains entry to cells. If one vaccine has used this strategy to stimulate immunity, others probably can, too.

Pfizer’s vaccine is also the first using a promising new technology. Many vaccines prime the immune system by introducing inert fragments of viral protein. This one gets the body to make the viral protein itself by inserting genetic instructions contained in a form of RNA. Because you can edit RNA, the vaccine can be tweaked should the spike protein mutate, as it may have recently in mink. This platform can be used with other viruses and other diseases, possibly including cancer, BioNTech’s original focus.

So celebrate how far biology has come and how fruitfully it can manipulate biochemical machinery for the good of humanity (there will be time later to worry about how that power might also be abused). And celebrate the potency of science as a global endeavour. Drawing on contributions from across the world, a small German firm founded by first-generation Turkish immigrants has successfully worked with an American multinational company headed by a Greek chief executive.

Yet despite the good news, two big questions stand out, about the characteristics of the vaccine and how fast it can be distributed. These are early results, based on 94 symptomatic cases of covid-19 from among the 44,000 volunteers. Further answers must wait until the trial has gathered more data. It is, therefore, not clear whether the vaccine stops severe cases or mild ones, or whether it protects the elderly, whose immune systems are weaker. Nor is it known whether inoculated people can still cause potentially fatal infections in those yet to receive jabs. And it is too soon to be sure how long the beneficial effects will last.

Clarity will take time. In the next few weeks the trial should be declared safe, though further monitoring of the vaccine will be needed. The companies predict that immunity will last for at least a year. The 90%-plus efficacy is so high that this vaccine may offer at least some protection to all age groups.

While the world waits for data, it will have to grapple with distribution. Vaccine will be in short supply for most of next year. Although RNA jabs may prove easier to make at scale than those based on proteins, Pfizer’s requires two doses. The company has said that it will be able to produce up to 50m doses in 2020 and 1.3bn next year. That sounds a lot, but America alone has over 20m first responders, medical staff, care-home workers and active-duty troops. Perhaps a fifth of the world’s 7.8bn people, including two-thirds of those over 70, risk severe covid-19. Nobody has ever tried to vaccinate an entire planet at once. As the effort mounts, syringes, medical glass and staff could run short.

Worse, Pfizer’s shots need to be stored at temperatures of -70°C or even colder, far beyond the scope of your local chemist. The company is building an ultra-cold chain, but the logistics will still be hard. The vaccine comes in batches of at least 975 doses, so you need to assemble that many people for their first shot, and the same crowd again 21 days later for a booster. Nobody knows how many doses will be wasted.

So long as there is too little vaccine to go around, priorities must be set by governments. A lot depends on them getting it right, within countries and between them. Modelling suggests that if 50 rich countries were to administer 2bn doses of a vaccine that is 80% effective, they would prevent a third of deaths globally; if the vaccine were supplied according to rich and poor countries』 population, that share would almost double. The details will depend on the vaccine. Poor countries may find ultra-cold chains too costly.

The domestic answer to these problems is national committees to allocate vaccine optimally. The global answer is COVAX, an initiative to encourage countries』 equal access to supplies. Ultimately, though, the solution will be continued work on more vaccines. Some might survive in commercial refrigerators, others will work better on the elderly, still others might confer longer protection, require a single shot, or stop infections as well as symptoms. All those that work will help increase supply.

Only when there is enough to go around will anti-vaxxers become an obstacle. Early reports suggest the jab causes fevers and aches, which may also put some people off. The good news is that an efficacy of 90% makes vaccination more attractive.

The tunnel ahead

The next few months will be hard. Global recorded death rates have surged past their April peak. Governments will struggle with the logistics of vaccination. America is rich and it has world-class medicine. But it risks falling short because the virus is raging there and because the transition between administrations could lead to needless chaos and delays. Squandering lives when a vaccine is at hand would be especially cruel. Science has done its bit to see off the virus. Now comes the test for society. ■

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline "Suddenly, hope"

相關焦點

  • 全球精英讀物「經濟學人」2 折限時促銷,還送 Moleskine 本子
    全球精英讀物「經濟學人」2 折限時促銷,還送 Moleskine 本子 《經濟學人》12 周數字版限時特價促銷啦,現價 ¥118 元,較零售價格優惠
  • 經濟學人商論
    這本政經雜誌的忠實讀者包括政商學界的決策者、企業家、各界精英人士等擁有巨大影響力的人群。通過智慧型手機及平板電腦,以及《經濟學人·商論》中英雙語APP直觀而具吸引力的用戶界面, 您可以閱讀由《經濟學人》編輯每月從周刊中挑選及翻譯的文章。它們涵蓋商業、金融、科技,分析全球商界走向,提供深度觀察和犀利觀點,這是《經濟學人》已經開始為全球讀者所領略的特色。
  • CCS Chemistry | 精心繪出化學的美麗- 盤點2020年CCS Chemistry封面
    貫穿全年的全球性新型冠狀病毒疫情終將讓2020年在歷史長河中成為極其特殊的一年,也讓我們更加確定了人類的生存安全和生活質量只能依靠科技的不斷進步。CCS Chemistry是帶著這樣的使命感誕生的。過去的2020年是CCS Chemistry首個完整的一年,在這一年裡,我們總共出版了6期。我們嚴格遴選作者們的精彩工作,精心設計每一期封面,展示化學的美麗與魅力。
  • T細胞將是人類對付新冠病毒的關鍵 | 經濟學人精講第809期
    當人體感染病毒後,不僅會產生抗體對抗病毒,T細胞在對抗病毒中也發揮重要作用,只不過T細胞攻擊的是被感染的細胞,以阻止病毒繁殖。新冠病毒的最新研究表明,當人體從疾病中恢復後,抗體水平會急劇下降,但T細胞對新冠病毒的免疫性卻持續存在。這對疫苗研究具有重要意義,最新研製的疫苗優先考慮了T細胞的產生,同時刺激產生抗體。寒冬臨近,雖然人類並沒有堵住新冠病毒的出口,但是在疫苗研製中,已經看到了曙光。
  • | 附最新經濟學人電子版+音頻
    | 附最新經濟學人電子版+音頻 學習英語,大量輸入是提升的基礎,今天為大家推薦學習英語的學習資料。文末可領取福利!我手頭有從2013到2015的兩年多一共90多期經濟學人,樣本數量足夠代表雜誌的總體用詞分布了(經濟學人的文章雖然沒有署名,但其作者數量並不多,且每個人的寫作風格,用詞風格也比較固定,因此這也為統計高頻詞提供了可能)。
  • 經濟學人|The reckoning 清算|2021.1.16封面文章2
    今天我們學習第二段,鑑於二段內容較多,今天就分享一段,後期會有全文解析,感興趣的小夥伴自己可先下載英文版全文,文末有新一期《經濟學人》的獲取方式哦。The article of impeachment that passed on January 13th accuses Mr Trump of inciting an insurrection.
  • 中英對照閱讀《經濟學人》,學習神器來了!
    官方內容和譯者團隊:提供《經濟學人》商業、金融、科技版官方中文譯本,由官方譯者團隊主持,分享最權威的學習方法與翻譯技巧英語學習VIP微信群:譯者老師+商論君每日推送最新內容,即時問答課堂筆記+內容拓展:官方譯者出品的課堂音頻+精讀原刊文本+瀏覽專業詞彙列表
  • T細胞將是人類對付新冠病毒的關鍵(二)| 經濟學人精講第810期
    當人體感染病毒後,不僅會產生抗體對抗病毒,T細胞在對抗病毒中也發揮重要作用,只不過T細胞攻擊的是被感染的細胞,以阻止病毒繁殖。新冠病毒的最新研究表明,當人體從疾病中恢復後,抗體水平會急劇下降,但T細胞對新冠病毒的免疫性卻持續存在。這對疫苗研究具有重要意義,最新研製的疫苗優先考慮了T細胞的產生,同時刺激產生抗體。寒冬臨近,雖然人類並沒有堵住新冠病毒的出口,但是在疫苗研製中,已經看到了曙光。
  • 《人民畫報》1960年1-24期封面欣賞
    1960年第4期:春節中的北京廠甸。1960年第11期:在陽光裡起航。五、六十年代,學校和社會對科學技術的教學尤其重視,各地成立了很多「少年之家」、「少年俱樂部」等校外活動組織,讓孩子們在輕鬆愉悅、理論聯繫實踐的環境中學習掌握科學知識。
  • 英國《經濟學人》文章:銘記2020,一切都改變了的一年
    參考消息網12月22日報導 英國《經濟學人》周刊12月19日一期發表題為《一切都改變了的一年——為什麼這場疫情大流行將作為轉折點而被人們銘記》的文章,全文摘編如下:沃倫·哈丁曾圍繞他的新詞「常態」(normalcy)營造其在1920年總統大選中的競選活動。
  • 《經濟學人》看《流浪地球》【經濟學人精講】第216期
    本文選自經濟學人2019年2月14日文章。本文從另一視角——中國的外交政策來點評這部電影,雖然一如既往的充滿酸腐的抨擊語調,但就文筆而言,可以說本文是《經濟學人》文章的典範,這篇文章也是我看過的眾多點評《流浪地球》的外刊文章中寫的最好的,全文短小精悍,語句流暢出眾,用詞準確多樣,節奏緊湊明快。由於篇幅較長,今天對本文標題和第一段進行精講,明天會繼續精講後續段落,幫助大家提高英語閱讀、翻譯和寫作能力。
  • INOVIO宣布2/3期新冠疫苗試驗2期階段
    該公司今天宣布,已獲得美國食品藥品監督管理局(FDA)的許可,可繼續進行計劃中的INO-4800(其候選新冠肺炎疫苗)2/3期臨床試驗的2期階段。計劃中的2/3期臨床試驗名為INNOVATE(INOVIO INO-4800VaccineTrial forEfficacy,即疫苗有效性試驗),這是一種隨機雙盲、安慰劑對照的安全性和有效性試驗,試驗將在美國成年人中進行。
  • 烏克蘭總統波羅申科曬《經濟學人》年刊封面 把普京頭像換成自己
    據說,他把雜誌封面上的普京P成了自己,然後被一眾網友當場戳穿…… 3日,波羅申科曬出了英國雜誌《經濟學人》的年刊封面《世界2017》,並附言「有些禮物不是被當做恭維,而是提醒你自己的責任」。 滿懷疑惑的小編找出了《世界2016》的那期封面,咦?
  • 新的一年,送給你特別的文案
    這一年的作業布置,估計要等到明年了。 The homework assigned this year is estimated to be retained until next year.
  • 牛津新冠疫苗2期臨床試驗:在健康老年人群中能誘導免疫應答
    原創 柳葉刀 柳葉刀TheLancet 《柳葉刀》(The Lancet)近日發表牛津COVID-19疫苗2期臨床試驗最新結果,試驗疫苗在健康老年人群(56歲及以上)和18-55歲的成年人群中的安全性和免疫原性結果是相似的。
  • 最新!常州47家新冠病毒疫苗接種單位名單!
    國家醫療保障局副局長李滔表示,接種費用將由醫保基金和財政共同負擔,居民個人不負擔費用。常州市最新發布 承擔新冠病毒疫苗緊急接種的醫療機構共47家點擊大圖查看↓↓注射過免疫球蛋白者應間隔1個月再進行接種。接種完成後,需現場留觀30分鐘,接種當日注射部位避免沾水並注意個人衛生,適當安排休息。接種後一周內避免接觸個人既往已知過敏物及常見致敏原,儘量不飲酒、不進食辛辣刺激或海鮮類食物,建議清淡飲食、多喝水。Q12. 接種新冠疫苗可能會有哪些不良反應?
  • 過去一年最值得分享的30個雜誌封面
    2016年9月,由美國導演奧利弗·斯通執導的影片《斯諾登》在多倫多電影節首映,紐約時報雜誌周末版封面以此為靈感,模擬了斯諾登出現在衛星電視中的畫面。這是過去一年這份雜誌奉獻的眾多經典封面中,最受歡迎的作品之一。藉助多媒體手段,印刷媒體的設計師們正希望展現更多的創意和設計上的可能。
  • 又是一年冬至節:過去誠然美麗,但未來更加可期!
    並且農民也不富裕,粗糧能吃飽就不錯了,吃肉是一件很奢侈的事情。只有逢年過節或者招待客人的時候才會買上一塊。那時候沒有冰箱,一般都是賣肉的叔叔凌晨現殺,然後白天走街串巷賣。每次聽到他長長的吆喝聲,小朋友們都爭先跑出去看。
  • 最好的聽書軟體 天翼閱讀有聲版安卓2.6.2正式上線
    作為中國第一聽書品牌的「天翼閱讀有聲版」,近日又推出了安卓有聲2.6.2版本。天翼閱讀有聲版是目前業內公認的聽書內容最多、聽書音質最好、用戶量最多、操作最簡單的聽書軟體,而這次上線的新版本又增加了不少人性化的功能。