盤點那些優秀的網友評論
今日專題
#30 網友討論太陽能
Netizens discuss solar energy
今天的專題聊聊太陽能的前景！
當太陽能徹底普及，未來會是怎樣的景象？
來看看今天網友們有什麼高見！
#1
Energy creates wealth on our planet. (machines, mobility, cheap products, etc… ) Cheap Solar power is going to create a lot of wealth for humanity.
能源在我們的星球上創造財富。（機器、機動性、廉價產品等等）廉價的太陽能將為人類創造許多財富。
#2
Can you also do a video about the recycling of solar panels and the environmental impact of that? I don’t find so much good sources for that, maybe you』ve better luck.
你能做一個視頻來介紹太陽能電池板的循環利用，以及它帶來的環境影響嗎？我沒找到這麼多資源，也許你的運氣更好。
#3
In the past solar has proved better at generating government subsidies than electricity.
過去已經證明，太陽能可以帶來比電能更好的政府補貼。
#4
What we really need is a breakthrough in US solar regulations.
我們真正需要的是在美國太陽能監管上作出突破。
#5
Behold the dark lord who draws power from the very shadows around us!
*Slowly charges watch.
看哪，黑暗之王從我們周圍的黑暗中汲取力量！
*慢慢給手錶充電。
#6
Hi, great work!
嗨，幹得好！
Your interpretation of the Shockley Queisser limit is slightly off. It is actually a fundamental limit for a single junction cell (a single diode on the chip) no matter what the material is. This is basedaround a concept known as the band gap, which is the energy an electron in a semiconductor or insulator needs to be be able to flow. More succinctly, it is the energy a photon needs to produce current (I’m trying to avoid jargon and going into too much detail). Any photon with energy less than the band gap doesnothing, while any photon with energy more than the band gap produces current. The issue is that if a photon has more energy than the band gap, that excessenergy is not converted into current due to other effects that I am avoiding.
你對肖克利•奎伊瑟極限的解釋有點偏差。這實際上是對一個單結電池（晶片上的一個二極體）的基本限制，無關乎它是由什麼材料製成的。這是基於一個被稱為帶隙的概念，它是半導體或絕緣體中的維持電子流動的能量。簡單點說，這是光子產生電流所需的能量（我儘量不用行話，也不涉及太多細節）。任何能量小於帶隙的光子都不起作用，而任何能量大於帶隙的光子都會產生電流。這個問題是，如果能量轉化成了另一個能隙，那就是避免了能量過剩。
The idea behind the limit is that you compare the emission of the sun vs an ideal solar cell, it is the maximum amount of power that can be produced based on the limitations above. There are tricks to get around this limit though such as layering junctions like you mentioned, but there are a couple of other ones such as photon up conversion that have the potential to be much cheaper since you don’t have to layer junctions, but just have to find a way to incorporate a molecular film.
限制背後的想法是，你比較太陽的和一個理想的太陽能電池的發射，它是根據上述限制，可以產生的最大功率。有一些技巧可以繞過這個限制，比如像你提到的分層連接，但是還有一些其他的方法，比如光子上轉換，有可能還便宜得多，因為你不需要對連接進行分層，只需要找到一種方法來整合分子膜。
#7
I have had a fantasy for the last ten years- what would happen if every home and building had solar panels? The disruption to the world energy market would be fabulous- it would collapse the oil market overnight
過去十年裡，我有想過，如果每家每戶都有了太陽能，會發生什麼事？世界能源市場將會出現一條很大的裂縫，石油市場將會在一夜之間土崩瓦解。
#8
After today 「living in shadows」 turns to mean 「 I am charging up」 ?
今天之後「生活在黑暗中」變成「我正在充電」
#9
Hey Matt, don’t know if you』ll see this comment, but highly recommend checking solar optical rectifiers (a.k.a optical rectennas) as a subject for future solar panel technology. They’re basically antennas, but for the optical and infrared spectrum. This means solar panels with theoretical near 100% efficiencies (in reality, experimental rectennas tuned for microwaves reach around 90%).
嘿，馬特，不知道你是否會看到這條評論，但強烈建議你檢查太陽能光學整流器（又稱光學整流器）作為未來太陽能電池板技術的主題。它們基本上是天線，不過這些天線是用於光學和紅外光譜。這意味著太陽能電池板的理論效率接近100%（事實上，實驗性的微波爐可以達到90%左右）。
This kind of tech would change the world dramatically, as we would finally be able to materialize things like mainstream solar powered cars and grid scale wireless energy transfer. There’s a company called Novasolix that apparently has 90% theoretical efficiency with their cell design. Hopefully they aren’t vapor ware, because their tech is very interesting.
這種技術將大大改變世界，因為我們最終能夠讓像主流太陽能汽車和電網規模的無線能源傳輸這樣的東西成為現實。有一家名為Novasolix的公司顯然在電池設計方面有90%的理論效率。希望他們不是蒸汽軟體，因為他們的技術非常有趣。
#10
Would you buy a car that doesn’t work in the dark?
你會想買一輛黑暗中沒法用的車嗎？
#11
Matt, you are my hero! I『ve been following photovoltaic technology since I first read about it in National Geographic’s when I was in 6thgrade and that was in 1975. Great information, you『ve confirmed my love and passion for this technology.
馬特，你是我的英雄！自從第一次在國家地理雜誌上看到光電技術起，我就開始關注它了，那時是1975年，我才讀六年級。一個很好的信息。你證實了我對這項技術的熱愛。
#12
U need to look at the PMMG4HYBRID Channel his stuff is really interesting Hint: one of his prototype device’s could solve the problems of solar power when the sun goes down
你需要看看PMMG4HYBRID頻道，他的東西真的是一個有趣的提示：他的一個原型設備可以解決太陽下山時太陽能發電問題
#13
「…which generates power from … you guessed it … shadows」 – No, I haven’t guessed it! You said it at least 5 times before!!!
「…能量從何而來…你猜了……黑暗」 — 不，我沒猜過它！你之前說了至少五次了
看看上面的網友的「知識底子」是否讓你們學到了新東西？
有何感想，歡迎在下方留言區留言。
本文為名鹽創作公眾號原創，未經允許嚴禁轉載！部分和內容圖片源於網絡，如有侵權請聯繫刪除。
名鹽創作，有意合作
可以聯繫：workstudios@126.com
歡迎長按以下的二維碼掃描關注名鹽創作公眾號。