本次推薦的是文章2020年發表在Organizational Research Methods期刊上。這篇文章強調了元分析研究中的透明度和可重複性，並提供了相應的檢查表。包括元分析中的各個過程：問題提出、檢索和納入標準、數據描述、分析和解釋。在寫作元分析的時候，可以一一對照，提高我們的元分析研究質量。非常建議大家讀一讀此文章。請關注微信公眾號「元分析」獲取更多精彩內容。
Recommendations for Reviewing Meta-Analyses in Organizational Research
This article encourages transparency in the reporting of meta-analytic procedures. Specifically, we highlight aspects of meta-analytic search, coding, data presentation, and data analysis where published meta-analyses often fall short in presenting sufficient information to allow replication. We identify opportunities where reviewers can request additional information or analyses that will enhance transparent reporting practices and facilitate the evaluation of quality in meta-analytic reporting. We focus on concerns specific to (or prevalent in) meta-analyses conducted in organizational research. In doing so, we reference a number of existing and emerging techniques, highlighting their contribution to meta-analysis while emphasizing key information reviewers may request. Our focus is primarily on meta-analyses, but secondary uses of meta-analytic data are also considered. We conclude by providing a checklist for reviewers in an effort to facilitate the review process as it pertains to the goals of transparency and replicability.
中文摘要
本文鼓勵在元分析報告中保持透明。具體來說，我們重點強調了元分析搜索、編碼、數據呈現和數據分析過程，其中已發表的元分析通常不能提供足夠的信息來滿足可重複性。我們發現了機會，審查者可以請求額外信息或分析，這些信息或分析將增強報告實踐的透明度，並促進對元分析報告質量的評估。我們關注特定於（或普遍存在於）組織行為領域元分析中的考慮。在此過程中，我們參考了許多現有技術和新興技術，著重強調了它們對元分析的貢獻，同時強調了關鍵信息審查者可能會要求的信息。我們的重點主要放在元分析上，但也考慮了元分析數據的二次使用。最後，我們為審查者提供了一份清單，以簡化與透明度和可重複性目標有關的審閱過程。