A Vietnamese vlogger's videos on YouTube havesparked some Chinese netizens』 anger because they suspect her of copying iconicChinese foodie influencer, Li Ziqi.
一名越南博主在YouTube上的視頻激起了中國網友的憤怒,他們懷疑她嚴重抄襲李子柒。
Titled Bếp Trên Đỉnh Đồi (it means "Kitchen onthe Hill"), her vlog features videos about cooking healthy food usingvegetables she grows herself.
這位自稱為Bếp Trên Đỉnh Đồi(意為「山中廚房」)的視頻博客主要以烹飪她自己種植的健康食品的視頻為主。
So far, the vlogger has nearly 190,000 subscriberson the video platform, with some of her videos recording 1 million views.However, many netizens have left comments below her videos saying they're toosimilar to Li's.
到目前為止,這位博主在視頻平臺上有近19萬名訂閱者,其中一些視頻的點擊量達到了100萬次。然而,許多網友在她的視頻下面留言說,這些視頻和李的太像了。
上圖越南美食博主視頻截圖,下圖為李子柒視頻截圖。
From the video content, the blogger's hairstyle andclothing to the kitchen furnishings, and even the involvement of a grandma anda puppy, the Vietnamese vlogger's videos have stirred up netizens' feelings.They view it as almost a "copy and paste" version of Li Ziqi, withsome suggesting it's an act of plagiarism.
無論是拍攝內容、鏡頭語言、敘事節奏,還是髮型、穿著、廚房擺設等,幾乎都是「複製粘貼」,甚至視頻裡也有奶奶和小狗。
"I'm not against people sharing videos oftheir farm lives, but this YouTuber has full-on plagiarized Li Ziqi," oneof the netizens, commented. "Please respect intellectual property."
「我並不反對人們分享自己田園生活的視頻,但這名用戶完全是抄襲李子柒。請尊重智慧財產權,」有網友如此評論道。
如何維權?
A lawyer says this is a very complicated situation.
就此事,有媒體採訪北京某事務所的律師,該名律師表示,這是一個非常複雜的情況。
According to TheCopyright Law, the law protects expression, not ideas. But the law doesn’t clearly define the boundary between"expression" and "idea".
《著作權法》在著作權上規定了「思想與表達二分法」,即法律只保護表達,不保護思想。但由於具體案件的情況不同,法律並沒有對「表達」與「思想」之間的界限進行明確規定。例如,李子柒視頻中的畫面,屬於故事表達,但其中關于田園生活的理念,同樣也應屬於思想。而屬於技巧的鏡頭運用,在一定維度也可能屬於思想。所以包括鏡頭運用、拍攝內容、髮型、造型等方面的雷同,屬於思想還是屬於表達,仍需進一步根據細節具體分析。
However, it is difficult to protect the rights,because in the application of law, international conventions or bilateralagreements on intellectual property rights need to be referred.
該名律師認為,如果該越南博主在視頻拍攝的表達上,與李子柒出現大面積雷同,必然侵犯了後者的著作權,「即便對方是越南籍,在其他國家的社交平臺發布視頻,同樣侵犯我國作者的著作權,同樣需要承擔侵權責任。但維權難度較大,因為在法律的應用上,需要參考智慧財產權的國際公約或雙邊協議。」
但如果雙方均是以田園為創意拍攝視頻,同樣用一個女人和老人的生活來表現田園寧靜,該名律師則認為無法認定其侵權,因為此部分屬於創作思想,「所以我們在判定的時候不能進行模糊對比,而是需要結合具體的視頻內容,把其中相似的表達進行精準比對。」
——內容均來自網絡